Should American Citizens Be Concerned About The Latest UN CERD Letter?
On August 4, the ACLU sent a letter to the Dept. of State urging it to submit a comprehensive periodic report to the CERD Committee, which thoroughly reviews both U.S. progress and setbacks in implementing the 2014 Concluding Observations on the federal, state and local levels.
In the letter, ACLU expects (read stresses) compliance with CERD recommendations involving a competitive grant program to increase socioeconomic diversity authored by Obama and after his 2015 report to the UN. In fact in a couple of places in the letter, the words “in accordance with CERD’s recommendation” appears and makes reference to a CERD “Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, United States of America” written in September 2014. The document references back to the “Convention” and States being in compliance with specific information on human rights.
Let’s also be clear ACLU sued Charlottesville in court for the right of the FAR RIGHT PERMIT HOLDERS TO HOLD THEIR RALLY. Yet in the above letter, they are against them? How does this equate? Can anyone say “set up” to get the UN involved?
NPR “Charlottesville Violence Highlights Cities’ Struggle To Balance Rights And Safety” August 14, 2017:
We were unfortunately sued by the ACLU and the judge ruled against us,” McAuliffe said. “That rally should not have been in the middle of downtown … where [people] dispersed all over the city streets, and it became a powder keg. We’ve got to look at these permits, and we’ve got to look at where we put these rallies and protesters.”
The ACLU responded that the injunction was the city’s fault because it mounted a weak legal case.
(Note: I published an article titled “UN vs USA on Civil Rights and Violence” on this in which Obama sent a report to the UN called “Report of the United States of America Submitted to the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights In Conjunction with the Universal Periodic Review”. It cited so-called “human rights” problems in the report and progress in same-sex marriages and transgenders advocacy among other things which led to the U.S. being subjected to scathing criticism from a variety of dictatorships after filing its report, including Chad, Pakistan, Russia, and China.)
Then very “coincidentally” not long after that letter, on August 23, 2017, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) sent a letter which “called on the Government of the United States of America, as well as high-level politicians and public officials, to unequivocally and unconditionally reject and condemn racist hate speech and crimes in Charlottesville and throughout the country.” The letter referenced “‘early warning and urgent action’ procedure.”
It was NOT in response both groups who were involved in the Charlottesville contretemps which would have made more sense. It was not inclusive of the radical Left activists who assembled without a permit in Charlottesville, but rather specifically addressed the radical Right groups that attended by permit and with the approval of a federal judge.
“We are alarmed by the racist demonstrations, with overtly racist slogans, chants and salutes by white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and the Ku Klux Klan, promoting white supremacy and inciting racial discrimination and hatred”, said CERD Chairperson Anastasia Crickley.
This letter from CERD shows extreme bias against the Right. It is not inclusive of the angst both sides have shown nor the violence perpetrated by the leftist BLM or ANTIFA. In other words, the SOCIALIST group know as CERD had no problem with the bad behavior of the left-leaning socialist groups only with those on the far Right who were not honestly indicative of all Americans but just like BLM and ANTIFA a mouthpiece for fringe behavior.
How does that affect the US? Well, let’s consider that Obama was and is for a WORLD government preferably one in which he is the autocratic ruler of at least a portion. Nearly everything he did in his eight years in office pointed toward the US dissolution as a national sovereign nation and its “ruling” position of strength and size with Obama at its helm. From allowing the UN liberties in determining laws affecting our role in the world to setting up a secure cities entity through DoJ and Loretta Lynch where cities worldwide would be interconnected, Obama made sure that we poured our tax dollars into the UN and NATO as well as our troops and our defense readiness on the mainland. I put a few indicators below this article though I guarantee there were more.
The budget for the Peacekeeping Operations from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017 was $7.87 billion. Of that amount according to their website, the top 10 providers of assessed contributions to United Nations Peacekeeping operations for 2017 are: United States (28.47%); China (10.25%); Japan (9.68%); Germany (6.39%); France (6.28%); United Kingdom (5.77%); Russian Federation (3.99%); Italy (3.75%); Canada (2.92%); and, Spain (2.44%).
Anyone else feeling the LUV of the socialist drain?
Now top that off with all of the red flags InfoWar and others sent up on the “world training” of Jade Helm and the sporadic notes of UN marked vehicles and personnel seen even this year in and around the US…
Here is citizen blog found on an off-off web site but still Might have relevance given that letter from CERD:
There have been multiple civilian sightings of strange planes landing at American Air Force bases, all carrying UN troops and/or having UN markings (or none).
My husband, a Vietnam vet, has been back and forth to Overton-Brooks VA Medical Hospital three times a week this month. Barksdale Air Force Base, one of the most secure Strategic Air Command (SAC) bases in the nation, has had unusual C-130s or C-136s fly into Barksdale AFB and land at all hours.
The interstate runs in front of the side and front of the base and is clearly visible with no restraints. (Barksdale is where President George W. Bush landed on 9/11, it is such a safe, secure, and well-guarded installation.)
These flights have been reported by other citizens and several of the military men who work inside the base have reported that the UN troops are given US military clothing and name tags. When our servicemen question this, the soldiers are told they did NOT see what they just saw. Base operations refused to confirm or deny or discuss these sightings.
Lately, rumors and reports regarding the presence of foreign troops in the US working with our armed forces have been hitting public awareness. Originally government sources denied these reports, but now official reports are confirming what eye witnesses had been reporting. (www.SaveAmericaFoundation.com) Russia herself confirms that the Obama administration has requested 15,000 Russian troops to train with FEMA in the event of a SHTF scenario, particularly in the Washington D.C., Maryland, and Virginia area.
The question is why? It appears that foreign troops are working with US troops, practicing on urban warfare, civil unrest, and civil disturbance scenarios. In Colorado, rumors of Russian troops practicing to deal with terrorist raids and martial law scenarios have been proven correct by our own US armed forces. Peterson AFB in Colorado is another base being used.
That the UN is pushing for world dominance governance over all nations is nothing short of terrifying. That the same group known as the UN is now more than halfway controlled by Socialist governing is telling. That Obama aided and abetted in the use of funds, forces, and equipment has been made clearer since President Trump took office especially after funds payments were reduced. It may have slowed the UN but it is obvious that forces without and within the US are working together to force a socialist agenda in which the US has little or no authority or rights as a sovereign nation.
To say that President Trump and our nation is under assault is abundantly apparent. We need to make sure that groups both far right and far left are stopped from ranting. Groups like BLM, ANTIFA, and others need to be labeled anti-American and treated as terrorists and Marxist. Calls for gearing up for armed conflict and takeover here in the US have been inching into mainstream lately are extremely dangerous. I refuse to name the sites because they don’t deserve even a minute of recognition.
The thing is to head off a civil war, the only choice is to investigate every one of the dangerous groups currently on the far left and the far right like the Neo-Nazis and KKK that show up without permits at planned gatherings and cause physical harm or chaos, investigate all websites (like the DoJ is currently in the process of doing), shut down their operations, freeze their financial backing, and declare them terrorists before they actually begin to cause any more harm.
It is also apparent from the pressure of groups like ACLU, Southern Poverty, actors, irresponsible congress members, and the other financial backers of these groups as well as the UN that — yes, we should be concerned. Concerned enough that the FBI, DoJ, and all local or state enforcement groups are prepared and placed on alert for their own safety and that of the public.
THIS IS EXACTLY WHY WE HAVE TO REMAIN VIGILANTE.
This is only a few but very relevant examples of many.
September 2013 and completed 2016: USA and 89 countries ratified the “United Nation’s Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)”, regulating the international trade in conventional arms – from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships.
September 2016: Breitbart article With only months left before leaving office, President Obama is committed to securing ratification of the United Nation’s Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)….even though Republicans in the Senate had already made clear the treaty would not be ratified, Secretary of State John Kerry signed it on September 25, 2013. NRA considered the treaty an invasive gun scheme. The treaty does this, in part, by “[urging] record keeping of end users, directing importing countries to provide information to an exporting country regarding arms transfers, including ‘end use or end-user documentation’ for a ‘minimum of ten years.’”
September 28, 2015: DoJ announced “Strong Cities Network” and Loretta Lynch addressed the UN on the subject October 2015. Cities are vital partners in international efforts to build social cohesion and resilience to violent extremism…“The Strong Cities Network will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration,” Lynch proclaimed for the United Nations SCN launch. Oathkeepers raised some valid concerns that the site proxy was listed as an “anonymous registration” which brought up any number of questions then. As of June 2017, the site has now been registered to Institute for Strategic Dialogue in London. ISD is a progressive think tank talking about radicalization, countering extremism, Islam, and most recently Charlottesville.
September 28, 2015: Obama’s address to the UN goes all in to push the united world governance through one government. “…It is this international order that has underwritten unparalleled advances in human liberty and prosperity. It is this collective endeavor that’s brought about diplomatic cooperation between the world’s major powers, and buttressed a global economy that has lifted more than a billion people from poverty. It is these international principles that helped constrain bigger countries from imposing our will on smaller ones, and advanced the emergence of democracy and development and individual liberty on every continent… we should celebrate the fact that later today the United States will join with more than 50 countries to enlist new capabilities — infantry, intelligence, helicopters, hospitals, and tens of thousands of troops — to strengthen United Nations peacekeeping…commitments we’ve made to the Sustainable Development Goals speak to this truth.
June 2013: Obama administration’s unprecedented decision to invite Russian troops for terror drills on U.S. soil, the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is now under fire for signing more agreements to “cooperate” with Vladimir Putin’s Russian “Emergencies Ministry” (EMERCOM) in a wide array of fields. Among the controversial deals outlined in an official Russian press release: exchanging of “experts” and “experience,” “provision of security at mass events,” and “cooperation in disaster response operations.” Critics of the scheme reacted with a mixture of fury and deep concerns…The extra-constitutional “agreements” were inked late last month in Washington, D.C., at the fourth annual meeting of the so-called “U.S.-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission Working Group on Emergency Situations.” The shady outfit, formed under the Obama administration, is one of almost two dozen similar “working groups” bringing together top U.S. and Russian officials. The bodies are cooperating on everything from the drug war and agriculture to terror, science, “rule of law,” health, environment, energy, nuclear issues, education, culture, media, business, arms control, and more, according to the U.S. State Department. The Senate has not ratified any of the international deals, as required by the Constitution… Citing the EMERCOM government press release, reporter Paul Joseph Watson said the agreements suggested that some major public events in the United States could rely in part on authorities from Russia to provide security. As the report pointed out, that would be a violation of federal law — not to mention the Constitution.