Intervention Complaint Filed Against the City of Los Angeles by DoJ

U.S. Files New Complaint Against City Of L.A. and a Former Redevelopment Agency to Recover Millions of Federal Grant Dollars Allegedly Obtained by Making False Promises to Provide Housing to Persons with Disabilities

DoJ
Press Release
August 1, 2017

The United States late yesterday filed a complaint in intervention against the City of Los Angeles and the CRA/LA (formerly the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles) alleging that together they fraudulently obtained millions of dollars in housing grants from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) by falsely certifying that the money was being spent in compliance with federal accessibility laws.

The complaint in intervention – which replaces a complaint previously filed on behalf of the United States by a “whistleblower” – alleges the city and CRA/LA received federal money by falsely promising to create accessible housing for people with disabilities. Instead of creating accessible housing, they used the money to create inaccessible housing that deprived people with disabilities an equal opportunity to find housing of their choice.

The city repeatedly certified its compliance with federal accessibility laws to obtain the federal funds without taking the required steps to ensure it complied, according to the complaint, which further alleges that many of the HUD-assisted apartment buildings failed to meet minimal accessibility requirements. The city allegedly approved the design and construction of inaccessible buildings, with, among other things:

  1. slopes and ramps that are too steep for safe passage by persons with mobility disabilities;
  2. door thresholds that are too tall for wheelchairs to roll over;
  3. steps that prohibit access to common areas;
  4. kitchen cabinets, shelves and surfaces that are outside of the accessible reach ranges of persons who use wheelchairs;
  5. sinks, grab bars, mailboxes and circuit breakers mounted beyond the reach of wheelchair users;
  6. pipes below sinks and lavatories that are not insulated, thereby posing a physical threat of burns to people who use wheelchairs; and
  7. insufficient numbers of accessible parking spaces in garages and lots.

“The complaint filed yesterday underscores the Department’s commitment to ensure that people with disabilities are provided equal access to federally-funded public housing, as required by law,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Chad A. Readler of the Justice Department’s Civil Division.

“Despite the federal government investing hundreds of millions of dollars in Los Angeles to create housing for everyone, the City of Los Angeles instead created housing only for some,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Sandra R. Brown for the Central District of California. “For 17 years, the city falsely certified that it had complied with federal law and covered up its repeated disregard of historic and important civil rights laws.”

The city and the CRA/LA allegedly violated Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Act, as well as failed to fulfill their duty to affirmatively further fair housing. Congress passed these accessibility laws to ensure people with disabilities have an opportunity to live in an integrated society, achieve independent living, and have the same opportunities for economic and social self-sufficiency as other citizens.

By law, the city and the CRA/LA are required to comply with the federal accessibility laws. They could not – neither directly, nor through contractual or other arrangements – deny people with disabilities the opportunity to benefit from housing services or subject them to discrimination based on disability.

The accessibility laws require recipients of federal funds to operate their housing programs in a manner that is accessible to people with disabilities. Among other things, they must have a system in place to ensure compliance with the laws. They are required to develop non-discriminatory policies and practices, hire a coordinator knowledgeable about accessibility, and implement a grievance procedure that allows for just resolution of complaints. They also must maintain a publicly available list of accessible units and their accessibility features so that people who require those features are able to find housing.

The federal accessibility laws also require that recipients of federal monies have a method in place to avoid giving accessible units needed by people with disabilities to people who do not need accessibility features. The laws also require that recipients of federal monies monitor apartment buildings to ensure they are designed, constructed and altered in compliance with the law so that, among other things, five percent of all units in certain multifamily housing will be accessible to people with mobility impairments, and an additional two percent will be accessible to people with visual and auditory impairments.

The United States’ lawsuit alleges that the city and CRA/LA failed to meet these legal obligations.

The lawsuit, United States ex rel. Ling, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., CV11-974-PG, was originally filed in U.S. District Court by whistleblowers Mei Ling, a resident of Los Angeles who uses a wheelchair, and the Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley, a nonprofit civil rights advocacy group. The United States elected to intervene in the lawsuit and take over the litigation, which prompted the unsealing of the whistleblowers’ complaint in June. The case is pending before U.S. District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez.

The lawsuit was filed under the qui tam – or whistleblower – provisions of the False Claims Act, which permit private parties to sue on behalf of the United States when they believe that a party has submitted false claims for government funds, and to receive a share of any recovery.

This matter was investigated by the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California and the HUD Office of Inspector General.

The claims asserted against the City of Los Angeles and the CRA/LA are allegations only; there has been no determination of liability.

–##–

Complaint filed: Case 2:11-cv-00974-PSG-JC Document 98 Filed 07/31/17

–00–

Whoops! HUD and the DoJ aren’t playing. Those cities that have been riding the system for years need to pay attention. I can just imagine all the guilty sucking in their guts and panicking, can’t you? lol

One wonders if the DoJ needs to also begin auditing California treasury, all federal agency grants, and other influx of federal money if it’s legally possible. Then take away ALL funds and see where these people fall. Maybe round up all those “weirdos” and put them in FEMA camps on top of the San Andreas fault line.

Need I remind you that California just moved closer to CALEXIT bill on the ballot.

Conservatives have been noted as leaving the state and moving in particular to Texas and other conservative areas.

–Uriel–

 

About Uriel

Retired educator and constitutionalist
Tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Intervention Complaint Filed Against the City of Los Angeles by DoJ

  1. Wendy says:

    I grew up in California. I was born in Los Angeles. It was 1950!!! I lived there until I was 17 and heading into my Senior yr. of H.S. (1968) It broke my heart to leave, due to a great promotion my Dad got from his Company. We were re-routed to Pennsylvania. Ugh! A landlocked State. Little did I know that the “Jersey Shore” was only a 45 minute drive to get to a beach! A total eye opener. So different from my beloved California! Come to present day, and I hear that my steadfast neighbors are beginning to leave. My next door neighbor was born and raised in Colorado. I’m sure she’ll head out with her 2 grown girls and lots of grandkids. Others will too if Calif. makes a move to secede!!!

Don't be bashful leave a comment and let us know what you think - Please note our Comment Policy (Please keep all comments on topic and relevant to the discussion. Thank You. )