State Department Grant Funds Used to Oppose Netanyahu

ACLJ Case Seeking Information About State Department Grant Funds
Used to Oppose Netanyahu Moves Forward

 

ACLJ
June 10, 2017

We obtained a crucial victory yesterday in our Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) litigation against the Department of State, in which we are seeking records concerning the then-Obama State Department’s grant of funds to several organizations that campaigned to unseat Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the 2015 Israeli elections.

The district court in Washington, D.C., ordered that we be permitted to file an amendment to our initial complaint detailing not just the State Department’s failure to abide by the requirements of the FOIA statute in responding to this particular request, but its intentional refusal to comply with its statutory obligations at all unless and until a FOIA requestor files a lawsuit to enforce the FOIA provisions and the court orders State to begin processing and producing responsive documents.

This is the second case in which a federal judge has allowed our pattern and practice claim against the State Department bureaucracy to take the first step forward.

We have previously discussed our FOIA request regarding these records, which will shed light on the Department’s decision to fund Prime Minister Netanyahu’s political opponents, who expressly sought to “take [Netanyahu] down” and to elect “anybody but Bibi” in the 2015 election. The State Department bureaucracy first shirked its duty of transparency by failing to respond to our request as required under the FOIA and then sought to have our lawsuit dismissed at the earliest stage, not once but twice. This would have effectively immunized the Department from having to comply and produce the documents we are seeking and simultaneously allowed it to perpetuate its general practice of refusing to respond to FOIA requests absent the filing of a federal lawsuit.

Based on additional information, we sought permission from the court to include further allegations in an amended complaint, allegations outlining the State Department’s pattern and practice of willful refusal (on multiple occasions) to properly respond to ACLJ’s FOIA requests until after we are compelled to file suit and obtain an order requiring State’s compliance with its legal obligations.

Despite the Department’s opposition to our filing this amended complaint, the district court issued an opinion and order rightly acknowledging that this claim must be allowed to proceed. Importantly, the court also addressed—and rejected—each of the objections raised by State.

As the court noted, we have specifically alleged a pattern or practice by the State Department of “forcing requestors to sue to obtain a FOIA response,” and, if true, “such a course of action would violate not only [the Act’s] time limits, but also the more basic requirement that agencies turn over documents in the first place.”

Citing our numerous factual allegations, the court concluded that our amended complaint clearly paints the picture of State’s repeated practice of (1) failing to respond to our requests for records; (2) compelling the filing of a lawsuit to enforce the terms of the FOIA; (3) only at that point admitting that it actually has responsive documents; and (4) promptly beginning to turn over those documents…

Such allegations, the court held, “at least encapsulate an informal modus operandi for the Department’s dealings with its requestors—in effect, a wink-wink that it takes a lawsuit for the Government to get going on its FOIA duties.”

Read the complete article HERE. (emphasis mine)

 

–00–

Good for ACLJ.  Without Judicial Watch, ACLJ, and a few other patriot organizations to fight in the courts for our rights, we would be in a world of hurt.

Time after time after time we find that the IRS 501 (c) groups are using their exempt funds in ways for which the grouping were never supposed to have been used.

Since this is true GET RID OF THE 501(C) and PACs.  

Democrats have used and abused these to further their own socialist agenda as have outside interests who would have never been allowed to be involved according to our laws.

The question becomes what happens if proven–Will Obama and his top administration ever be held responsible for all their corrupt and at times treasonous actions?

–Uriel–

About Uriel

Retired educator and constitutionalist
Tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to State Department Grant Funds Used to Oppose Netanyahu

  1. Shar says:

    Now that was true obstruction not the baloney they are going after Trump for. I guess it depends if we ever get control back of the Dept of Justice. I would love to see justice done. Time will tell. Double shame on the GOPe for not supporting our President.

    • Uriel says:

      Agreed Shar. I just saw one Republican congressman quoted as against Trump supposedly blaming him in part for the baseball shooting . This is ridiculous. Why can’t Republicans actually stand together behind the President is beyond me.

  2. malenurseken says:

    Guess I dont know for sure. Are members of DOJ elected? Looks like swamp rats there need flushing down swamp toilet. And Uriel, YEA that congressman calls himself a REP! How much you wanna bet he is DEM ran under REP ticket! OR a socialist! These bastards are inflitrating our Govt any way that works!

    • Uriel says:

      There are both regular permanent and confirmed Malenurse. Those at the top being confirmed. I agree those dang wolves in sheep clothing need outed as well.

  3. Hardnox says:

    This is good news but it won’t change anything as Obama-Hillary-Kerry won’t get slapped for it. The only thing positive is that Tillerson will make sure it doesn’t happen again.

    • SafeSpace says:

      Agreed 100%, Hardnox. The Deadly Trio you named will have to await their afterlives to receive the punishment they have earned.