Sadiq Khan: London Is “The Safest Global City In The World”

Well, Mister Islamic Mayor of London, if that is indeed fact, I think I’ll stay on this side of the pond. Mr. Khan (PBUH)  is busy “coordinating the response to this horrific attack”.  Note his two-pronged focus:  On response not on prevention, and on optics control not on substance.  Good progressive globalist asshat (or is that ass-taqiyah?) that he is, Mr. Khan cannot, dare not allow himself to speak the most fearful words in the western world: “Islamic terrorism”.  No, he finds it more amusing to trash President Trump for DJT’s repeated demands for a temporary US travel ban on citizens from six known terrorist-harboring Muslim nations, demands that are grow more logical to anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear each passing day.

This writer noted with grim amusement the absence of armed police in London’s popular tourist districts.  Indeed, the unarmed bobbies are said to have fled when the Allahu Akbar Gang rode onto the bridge and into the crowds of pedestrians.  Mr. Khan worries about “providing reassurance” to Londoners …. and many of his countrymen are so numbed from years in a progressive-run, unarmed state that they tweet their support for this approach.  I cannot imagine what it must be like to be so brain-dead, so oblivious to the course of recent history, so ignorant of reality and su frigging busy being culturally sensitive that “increased police presence following the attacks” satisfies all concerns for the future.  But hey, Londoners can pat themselves on their backs for demonstrating their glorious inclusiveness by electing a Muslim for their Mayor.  Let’s give them an honorary Keith Ellison Award!

Why worry about the lock on the pasture gate when the flock has already run off?  Because leftists have taught their sheep that no locks are needed …. indeed, no gates and no fences, either.  We should all just happily co-exist in Unicorn Land.  Ask the parents of local Ariana Grande fans how well that has been working.

One hopes that Sadiq Khan, Emmanuel Macron, Angela Merkel, and their ilk enjoy spending their thirty pieces of silver while their betrayed and disarmed countrymen spend their days and nights looking over their shoulders, hoping to see that “coordinated response” to the inevitable coming attack.

I never was much interested in traveling to England, or cruising down the Rhine with a boatload of well-off old white people, or even hiking my heritage countryside in Ireland.  Now the resolve to spend my time and my dime in the USA has been reinforced.  Not because of fear of Muslims, mind you, but because I have a hard time justifying the contribution of even one of my hard-earned Yankee dollars to people who willingly allow themselves to be governed by idiots.  And until such time as the leaders of these nations follow President Trump’s advice about Islamic terrorists and DRIVE THEM OUT, this deplorable boy is staying home.

London attacks: Mayor Sadiq Khan dismisses Trump criticism

The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has dismissed criticism from US President Donald Trump over his response to Saturday’s terror attack.

The attack in London Bridge and Borough Market killed seven and injured 48.

Mr Trump accused Mr Khan of downplaying the attack by telling Londoners there was “no reason to be alarmed”.

Mr Khan’s team said he had “more important things to do than respond to Mr Trump”, who had “deliberately” taken his remarks “out of context”.

“The Mayor is busy working with the police, emergency services and the government to co-ordinate the response to this horrific and cowardly terrorist attack and provide leadership and reassurance to Londoners and visitors to our city,” Mr Khan’s spokesperson added.

On Saturday night, following the attack, Mr Trump tweeted a message of support to the UK, but also sparked controversy after he called for his travel ban on visitors from six predominantly Muslim countries to be upheld by US courts.

On Sunday, he criticised Mr Khan, writing: “At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack and Mayor of London says there is ‘no reason to be alarmed!'”

His tweet angered many in the UK, who pointed out Mr Khan had been referring to increased police numbers on the streets.

During an interview earlier on Sunday, Mr Khan had said: “Londoners will see an increased police presence today and over the course of the next few days. No reason to be alarmed.”

Mr Khan had also said: “One of the things the police and all of us need to do is ensure that we’re as safe as we possibly can be.

“I’m reassured that we are one of the safest global cities in the world, if not the safest global city in the world, but we always evolve and review ways to make sure we’re as safe as we possibly can.”

Following the attack, Mr Trump also tweeted that “we must stop being politically correct and get down to the business of security for our people”, and that there was no gun debate after the attack “because they used knives and a truck”.

Later on Sunday, Mr Trump visited the Trump National Golf Club in Virginia for the second time over the weekend.

Mr Trump and Mr Khan have clashed several times in the past.

During the US presidential campaign last year, Mr Trump first proposed the ban on Muslims entering the US, but suggested he could make an exception for Mr Khan, who is London’s first Muslim mayor.

Mr Khan rejected the offer, saying: “It’s not about me, it’s about my friends, family and others from all around the world.”

Mr Khan also accused Mr Trump of being “ignorant” about Islam and making both the US and UK “less safe”.

Mr Trump responded by challenging Mr Khan to an IQ test, and said he was offended by Mr Khan, adding: “He doesn’t know me, never met me… I will remember those statements.”

An IQ test?  Why waste time trying to measure a number that small.  Maybe a simple inquiry into what Mr. Khan hears from the imam at his local mosque would be more revealing. 

Note in the video that Mr. Khan says he “will never let the terrorists win”.  Just one question, Mr. Globalist P.C. Jackwagon Mayor:  Why are you so damned intent on even giving them a chance?  DRIVE THEM OUT, moron.

   — SafeSpace —

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Sadiq Khan: London Is “The Safest Global City In The World”

  1. Uriel says:

    Good one SafeSpace!

  2. Terry says:

    Safest for who ? Oh yeah…Hizzoners’ muzzie friends.
    How stupid can people be to elect a muslim to a high office ?
    Oh wait, the U.S. did.
    Never mind.

  3. I.R. Wayright says:

    “We won’t let the terrorists win.”
    Really? What is the body count of us versus them?
    Who is winning?

  4. vonMesser says:

    During the Blitz you Brits stood up against terror and tyranny. Today you run from terror and vote tyranny into office as the Lord mayor.

  5. Felinity says:

    Well said, vonMesser. Having brains that have marinated far too long in the PC Sea, many Brits have lost the ability to discern good from evil…and the moral fiber to fight the latter in turn. Take in the “then-and-now” contrasts in these two links:

    • Terry says:

      Excellent photo-journey Felinity.
      I don’t think we will be seeing those determined smiles and take-it-in-stride attitudes from them when their daughters are being raped and their sons beheaded.

  6. Hardnox says:

    Good piece SafeSpace. Good rant too. The mayor is an idiot. If London is so safe why aren’t ALL the cops armed? Several cops ran away from the troglodytes as they were butchering Londoners.

    Like everyone is asking, why are they embracing this venomous culture while ignoring the root cause while at the same time offering platitudes for the innocents that were murdered? It’s insane.

    Raid the mosques. Round-up the known islamists. Do the right thing and keep your citizens safe… and STFU.

  7. Auntie BS says:

    Excellent, SafeSpace! The mayor is an idiot, trying to suppress growing consequences of his Muslim brethren’s misdeeds and atrocities. It’s time to call a spade a spade.

    That’s the trouble with allowing immigration from a ideology that tries to produce the most offspring they can– often at taxpayers expense– and in a generation or two, they become a majority in their enclaves and elect Muslim politicians. Well, you know the rest.

    Islam is more of a political global conquest than it is a religion and should be called so and banned.