EO 13781 Comprehensive Plan for Reorganizing the Executive Branch


“The American people elected me to fight for their priorities in Washington, D.C. and deliver on my promise to protect our Nation. I fully intend to keep that promise.” President Trump.

Government Executive Mgmt
March 16, 2017
(all emphasis is mine)

With the aim of “making government work again,” the Trump White House on Thursday unveiled a $1.1 trillion budget blueprint for discretionary spending in fiscal 2017 and 2018 that would abolish 19 agencies and eliminate thousands of agency jobs.

The 54-page “America First” document, focused primarily on fiscal 2018, would boost the Defense Department and related programs at Energy by $54 billion, and Homeland Security by $2.8 billion. It would offset such increases by cutting the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development by $10.1 billion (28 percent) and the Environmental Protection Agency by $2.6 billion (31 percent). The latter cut would eliminate approximately 3,200 positions, according to the document.

“This 2018 Budget Blueprint will not add to the deficit. It has been crafted much the same way any American family creates its own budget while paying bills around their kitchen table; it makes hard choices.

The President’s commitment to fiscal responsibility is historic. Not since early in President Reagan’s first term have more tax dollars been saved and more Government inefficiency and waste been targeted. Every corner of the Federal budget is scrutinized, every program tested, every penny of taxpayer money watched over.

Our $20 trillion national debt is a crisis, not just for the Nation, but for every citizen. Each American’s share of this debt is more than $60,000 and growing. It is a challenge of great stakes, but one the American people can solve. American families make tough decisions every day about their own budgets; it is time Washington does the same.” Mick Mulvaney, Director, Office of Management and Budget

The agency-by-agency plans include eliminating dozens of grant programs at the Education and Commerce departments (as well as other agencies)—many of them related to climate change. (saving billions of dollars and also consolidating some programs) And Trump would eliminate the following agencies:

African Development Foundation; the Appalachian Regional Commission; the Chemical Safety Board; the Corporation for National and Community Service; the Corporation for Public Broadcasting; the Delta Regional Authority; the Denali Commission; the Institute of Museum and Library Services; the Inter-American Foundation; the U.S. Trade and Development Agency; the Legal Services Corporation; the National Endowment for the Arts; the National Endowment for the Humanities; the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation; the Northern Border Regional Commission; the Overseas Private Investment Corporation; the United States Institute of Peace; the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness; and the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

Many of those agencies have been on the target lists of conservative budget hawks for many years.

“The defense and public safety spending increases in this budget blueprint are offset and paid for by finding greater savings and efficiencies across the federal government,” Trump wrote in his introduction. “We are going to do more with less, and make the government lean and accountable to the people. This includes deep cuts to foreign aid,” he added. “Many other government agencies and departments will also experience cuts. These cuts are sensible and rational. Every agency and department will be driven to achieve greater efficiency and to eliminate wasteful spending in carrying out their honorable service to the American people.”

Budget Director Mick Mulvaney called the president’s commitment to fiscal responsibility historic: “Not since early in President Reagan’s first term have more tax dollars been saved and more government inefficiency and waste been targeted,” he said. “Every corner of the federal budget is scrutinized, every program tested, every penny of taxpayer money watched over. “

The bulk of the plan’s text addresses proposed reforms in agency management and performance, stressing an “evidence-based” approach to improving programs and services as well as hiring.

“Delivering high-performing program results and services to citizens and businesses depends on effective and efficient mission support services,” the blueprint said. “However, despite years of efforts to improve these critical management processes, managers remain frustrated with hiring methodologies that do not consistently bring in top talent, acquisition approaches that are too cumbersome, and [information technology] that is outdated.”

The Office of Management and Budget also implicitly criticized the Obama administration’s management approach for focusing too much on unproductive “compliance activities” that fail to give managers sufficient freedom.

“Past management improvement initiatives resulted in the creation of hundreds of guidance documents aimed at improving government management by adding more requirements to information technology, human capital, acquisition, financial management, and real property,” it said. “These governmentwide policies often tie agencies’ hands and keep managers from making common sense decisions. As a result, costs often increase without corresponding benefits,” it said. “The administration will roll back low-value activities and let managers manage, while holding them accountable for finding ways to reduce the cost of agency operations.”

The Trump team vowed to improve procurement and other support functions by using “available data to develop targeted solutions to problems federal managers face, and begin fixing them directly by sharing and adopting leading practices from the private and public sectors.”

All agencies, it continued “will be responsible for reporting critical performance metrics and showing demonstrable improvement,” an allusion to recently reported plans to revive a George W. Bush-era program for measuring effectiveness.

The budget document recaps Trump’s recent executive orders promoting deregulation. “When it comes to regulatory reform, it is abundantly clear that the president means business,” the document reads. “The president has put into place truly significant new structural mechanisms that will help to ensure that major regulatory reforms are finally achieved on behalf of the hardworking and forgotten men and women of America.”

Plans for reorganizing the agencies, it said, are best made from the White House. “In roughly a year, the Congress will receive from the president and the director of the Office of Management and Budget a comprehensive plan for reorganization proposals.”

Fast upon its release, affected interest groups began defending their programs and budget analysts weighed in with reminders that Congress does the bulk of preparation of the budget that becomes law. Some noted that the so-called “skinny budget”—about half the length of the 134—page document President Obama’s new team submitted early in 2009—by design does not address the longer-term spending issues such as entitlement programs, tax policy and interest on the debt, all of which will be dealt with in a longer budget planned for May.

Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, said, “We understand that the new administration needs time to develop its comprehensive budget plan, but there is too little information and too few details to evaluate the budget.” While applauding the Trump plan to offset spending hikes in fiscal 2018, she warned that debt and deficits would continue to rise. And “such aggressive domestic discretionary cuts will be hard to sustain given that this area of the budget has already undergone large cuts and is projected to grow more slowly than inflation,” she said.

One agency facing elimination under the Trump budget, the Institute of Museum and Library Services, sent Government Executive the following statement:,” Museums and libraries throughout the nation provide critical resources and services that contribute significantly to Americans’ economic development, education, health and well-being. The grants and programs that IMLS administers are helping libraries and museums make a tremendous difference in the communities they serve, whether by facilitating family learning, sustaining cultural heritage or by stimulating economic development through job training and skills development.”

Patricia Harrison, president and CEO of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, said in a statement, “The elimination of federal funding to CPB would initially devastate and ultimately destroy public media’s role in early childhood education, public safety, connecting citizens to our history, and promoting civil discussions for Americans in rural and urban communities alike.”



Oops the hounds are already baying and the wagon trains circling. To be sure–the Dims and RINOS are determined to save and add to all their little pet porkie projects as they plot and plan behind closed doors. 

People are seeing their incomes on the line and their programs in jeopardy. But what they refuse to acknowledge is that the programs have to show justification and performance. We have demanded for years that government is overburdening our tax dollars, issuing pages and volumes of irritating, irrational, and overly burdensome rules and regulations while not even following laws already on the books.  

Draining the swamp is going to be a hateful, often times difficult decision-making and painful process.  It is very necessary though if there is any hope of reining in government waste and redundancy. Our country can no longer provide fat pockets to elites, congress members, or certain contractors.  We must begin reducing federal government if there is any chance to survive the economic world crisis currently looming. We have all known that saving our country would require more than simple rhetoric or political promise. However, the alternative is an insolvent, crippled country at a time when we least can afford it.

I applaud and truly admire the determination Trump  has shown to do what he was elected by the people to do and to keep his campaign promises even as the liberals and half the Republicans dig in their heels to do everything they can to throw up roadblocks and try to delegitimize his right to do so.  


About Uriel

Retired educator and constitutionalist
Tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to EO 13781 Comprehensive Plan for Reorganizing the Executive Branch

  1. Peppermint says:

    I like Trump’s idea of getting rid of these programs that are unnecessary and waste hard earned tax payer money. I hate to think of how much he’s going to have to fight to get any of this done. Liberals love to spend our money as they never dig into their own pockets for anything.

    I’d love to see government pensions reigned in too. After all being in the government are the biggest welfare recipients. And why should we pay for their elitist life styles. Their salaries need to be reigned in too.

    For the clerks and administrative assistants, they could never get paid what they do in the business world.

    So you end up having a tax payer who does the same job for about $35 to $40 thousand dollars paying taxes to pay for their peers in the government who make $80 to $100 thousand. Something is really wrong about that.

    • Uriel says:

      I definitely agree Pepper. Don’t forget those employees have enjoyed a position which is tenured and perks most in business secretary positions have no access to. In addition most businesses have secretaries doing double and triple duty as an economic necessity while government piles little on their people and has two to three times more than needed to get the job done.

      • Peppermint says:

        Uriel , so right you are. While on my last job I was the IT person but many of my women friends were “administrative assistants”. They did way more work than just taking notes. And none of the perks the ones “on the welfare” role in the government. It really ticks me off to have to pay these people so much more than what I’ve seen our admins do.

  2. SafeSpace says:

    “The Woodrow Wilson International Center For Scholars” …. I’ll volunteer to go there and personally help tear that place down, for free. Just imagine the progressive crapola WE have been funding there ….

    • Uriel says:

      I know nothing about that center. Tucked away in many cities are lots of such places I believe just as the UN has multiple offices across our country in particular college campuses.