Can Hillary Steal The Electoral College?

Team Clinton has announced they will launch vote recounts in three states that are currently in Trump’s column: Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. Her thugly Soros-funded crew of extortionists and thieves is looking to assemble enough electoral votes to put Madame Clot in the Peoples’ House.  Can she do it?  Here are some numbers and a few thoughts on the subject.  All statistics are from  Despite Politico’s known leanings, their site is reliable for raw data.  All figures given are current as of 11/27/2016.

Nationwide, Hillary holds a popular vote lead of 1,322,095 votes:  Hillary 62,523,126 vs Trump 61,201,031.  The electoral college is just the reverse: Trump has 290 in his column and La Clot has 232.  Remember that 270 electoral votes are needed to win.

Six unnamed electors who were committed to Trump have gone on record this past week, announcing that they have caved to Democrat extortion and will cast their votes for Hillary.  Assuming this is true, Trump now can count on 284 votes, just 14 more than the bare minimum required for victory.  More importantly, Madame Clinton may now hold 238, which is 32 short of the required 270 votes to win.

In Wisconsin, Trump leads the popular vote by 27,257.  He has 1,409,467 votes to Clinton’s 1,382,210.  Wisconsin controls 10 electoral votes.

Pennsylvania’s scorecard gives Trump a popular vote lead of 67,436:  The Donald 2,912,141 vs Hillaroid 2,844,705.  The Keystone state controls 20 electoral votes.

Rust-belt Michigan shows Trump leading by a mere 11,612 popular votes:  2,279,805 to 2,268,193.  Michigan holds 16 electoral votes.

Flip Pennsylvania and Michigan, and the Dems remain in control of the Presidency.  Not a good thought.  How likely is this to happen?

Team Hillary claims there “may be evidence” of Russian hacking of voting machines in the three states in question.  On the face of it, that is an absurdly ridiculous claim.  The only reported hacks (if they even were hacks) of voting machines caused some machines to select Hillary as the default choice for president if the voter left that field blank.  And a very few precincts here and there reported machines that switched Trump votes to Hillary, if the voter did not carefully review the ballot before finalizing it.  And speaking of hacks … the only evidence we have of Russia actually hacking something is Hillary’s emails, via her private server.  Nonetheless, with the level of corruption in the DoJ and the Federal Elections Commission, Clinton’s recounts may well proceed.  If her clowns make any claims of “victory”, I hope Team Trump has a phalanx of savage attorneys on standby.

Some conservative talking heads are making the argument that, if votes cast by illegals are subtracted from the totals, Trump’s 1.3 million national popular vote deficit may well disappear.  Trump may even discover he has more legitimate popular votes than Chelsea’s mom does.  This argument sounds good, but how would one determine how many voters were illegals?  The states where illegal immigrants vote in significant numbers do not have voter ID laws.  Should conservatives drive around cities like Detroit, looking for furriners standing on street corners, and demand to know how they voted?  Even in states with voter ID requirements, there is no legal way to connect an illegal’s vote to a specific candidate, even if you identify that the vote was ineligible.

To answer the question in this article’s title:  YES, there is a slim chance that Clinton can claim enough electors to steal the Electoral College vote.  If I were a betting man (and I am not), I would make pretty slim book on this happening … but it remains a possibility.  Folks, you might back off the gloating and the schadenfreude a wee bit for the moment.  This one ain’t over until someone puts their right hand on the Bible on January 20, 2017.

— SafeSpace —




Tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Can Hillary Steal The Electoral College?

  1. Pingback: HN&F | Can Hillary Steal The Electoral College? | Brittius

  2. Hardnox says:

    If this goes wrong the shooting will start in earnest. People won’t stand for this treachery.

    Two things must occur AFTER the electors do whatever… The governors need to certify the votes and send them to the House, then the House votes to accept them.

    It’s over.

    I recommend Leftards find a tall building or bridge..

    • Uriel says:

      If states stood up to Stein and said he’ll no our votes have been certified and we refuse to spend all that money to recount it would stop her cold. However the libtard threats and harassment of Electors is a different kettle of fish. If we had an FBI and DOJ leadership worth a damn this would already have been stopped along with the south end of northbound mules rioting.

  3. myfoxmystere says:

    The prophecy on Trump as President has come true. God told the prophet that the liberals and establishment will be wasting their money trying to keep Trump out. Let the clowns burn themselves into poverty.

  4. SafeSpace says:

    Paul Joseph Watson shares my concern, pointing to the remarkable (for her) amount of cash raised in 24 hours by Jill Stein, who is apparently Hillary’s surrogate in this recount effort:

  5. Terry says:

    I believe that at it’s worst outcome they want to make Trump seem even more illegitimate, that he did not win the popular vote , he did not win the Electoral College (did not reach 270), and was elected by being inserted into the presidency by members of his own party in Congress , thus they can continue their whining and claiming it was not the will of the people.

  6. Uriel says:

    Exactly what I have cautioned all along SafeSpace. The Dems are determined by hook or more likely crook to attempt to steal the race either by arm twisting Electors or out-and-out fear of death threats. The next days until the oath are DANGEROUS.

  7. Peppermint says:

    This is a possibility since there are electors who are already saying they will change their votes to Clinton and with the death threats they are receiving are probably coming from Clinton minions they are scared.

    And yes Soros is behind this. This happens right after Soros had his weekend meeting on how to get rid of Trump. No surprise here.

  8. SafeSpace says:

    Why has nobody tried to whack Soros? For some 30 years Soros has nearly destroyed economies, interfered with elections, funded riots, trashed personal and public property, and bilked Lord knows how many investors by manipulating commodity prices. And yet he lives on. Does nobody know where he is? Is he being protected by some furrin leader who benefits from Soros’ screwing with western nations?