Where Can One Find A Complete Site For General Presidential Election 2016


Most election officials typically finalize (certify) election results two weeks after Election Day — just in case anyone questions any totals, as of today 11/16/16, none can legitimately say they are final until they have been state certified.

I went looking through all kinds of sites most point to CNN, Politico, or Fox for voting information, but given what we currently know I REFUSE to accept CNN or most MSM results as “final”.  That leaves social media — ain’t happening, some are fake and some have agendas. I am not sure why there is not a national reporting location that is a verified results site for the nation rather than depending on media or some idiot out there with an agenda to make a point.

However that said, the one that seems not only most complete but very informative and non-partisan seems to be “Dave Leip’s Atlas of 2016 Presidential General Election Data – National”.  A quick scan seems to indicate a minor (+/-) error on data compared to other less trustworthy site totals but it does appear to be relatively consistent with what states are posting as projected final.   (NOTE: the data used in the spreadsheet has a use fee.)

It appears that even the “johnny-come-latelys” like California, New Hampshire and Michigan have been updated as 100% complete on this atlas site. So to help you guys who enjoy looking at data sheets, the ones on the Leip site are interactive and easily understood.

Here is the direct link to the site: Dave Leip’s Atlas



Going by the grand totals at the bottom: There were a total of   130,909,030 popular registered votes cast and 538 electoral votes to be handed out.

Trump  received 306 Electoral votes………………61,251,881 Popular votes

Clinton received 232 Electoral votes………………62,413,443 Popular votes

The votes for third party or non-party candidates cost BOTH the REPUBLICAN and the DEMOCRAT parties a loss of  7.2 million voters total or in part for their parties.

Another possible general non-partisan site to get information from is United States Election Project and can be seen HERE. Noted on that site is that there were estimated to be only 134,537,600 or 58.1% out of an estimated total voting eligible population of 231,556,62. Interesting difference between the two sites so it makes me wonder just who the US Election Project is including.

While Trump and the election brought out a wildly higher turnout than many elections over the years, there needs to be a way that EVERY citizen or naturalized citizen has to also become engaged in planning the future of this country. Whether like Australia or other countries we are forced to penalize or in some way require participation, is the question I see.  That 41.9% has no right in the way of things to complain or dissent if they did not participate.  This is exactly how we have nearly lost our constitution and our freedoms over the last decades.  Something has to be done.  The few should not realistically be deciding for the total despite party or lack of interest in the process.

Just putting it all out there as I am sick of hearing rants from all sides about counts and fairness.


About Uriel

Retired educator and constitutionalist
Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Where Can One Find A Complete Site For General Presidential Election 2016

  1. myfoxmystere says:

    The whiners need to stop saying it’s unfair and start growing up. They had 8 years of what they wanted at our expense. The days of freeloading are over.

  2. Uriel says:

    Amen MyFox. But all they know how to do is whine

  3. Shar says:

    How long do you think its going to take for them to get over it? Its getting old.
    Heard the left wants to propose a law to let popular vote decide the election.

    • Uriel says:

      Shar at this point I am guessing at least a year. The libbies are beginning to question though so that may be a good sign (fingers crossed) for the first time in a long time they have forced Pelosi to concede a point. That may be the hope we have been looking for. At least I pray so. I am thinking we may be seeing a lot more questioning even with the RINOS. Maybe some ratting out folks will follow.

  4. Hardnox says:

    The left is still hard at work finding absentee ballots. No doubt there will be millions more. I submit f the illegal votes are dismissed then Trump would have won by a landslide in either category.

    • Uriel says:

      I agree Hardnox if every state with overt 50% Dem votes were examined at least a third would have thousands of illegals and dead voters thrown out.

  5. Shar says:

    Maybe its time for the states to purge the dead and illegal voters. There are only four states left in Dem control. It would be a good start for next election. Lets face it we will only be purging Dems.

    • Uriel says:

      I agree Shar. State databases should be coordinating births and deaths. To me there is no excuse in today’s world to not pull and “purge” those records. They intrude on our lives all the time we are alive and can’t do that? If we go to Social Security they pull up when we worked and now with doctor bases when we sneezed so this ought to be simple. I think the only reason they don’t is it skews their chance for federal funds.