Thank God Our ForeFathers Thought Ahead To Provide An Equalizer To Popular Vote

A lot of learned idiots out there have been determined to try to eliminate the Electoral College. People like me who do not understand the foundations laid by our forefathers at times, should be grateful they provided an Electoral College as a counterbalance to popular vote for such a critical position as president.

Many people say do away with the Electoral College but look at the results of voting last night between Hillary and Trump.

Republican – Donald Trump  289 electoral votes      to       Democrat – Hillary Clinton’s 218 electoral votes

As of early Wednesday morning,

Clinton had 58,909,774 total votes    compared to    Trump’s 58,864,233 total votes

according to CBS News and CNN. The tallies will continue to change but Clinton holds a 47.6 percent lead compared to Trump’s 47.5 percent.


Popular Vote as we have been witness to this election can be warped, changed, and through various means weighed to favor one candidate over another.

Thank goodness for the Electoral College where popular vote is converted to specifically designed calculated votes to level the playing field.  Otherwise Clinton would have won by the slenderest of popular vote count over Donald Trump.  If the electoral college were not able to counterbalance popular vote, only those states with the highest populations (mostly coastal states) would rule the entire country according to their wishes. The playing field would only pay lip service to the wishes of the entire population.

Electoral College briefly explained – The candidate who receives an absolute majority of electoral votes (currently 270) for the office of president or of vice president is elected to that office. Not only did our forefathers foresee a counterbalance to popular vote but with the Twelfth Amendment provided a third way forward if needed. The Twelfth Amendment provides for what happens if the Electoral College fails to elect a president or vice president. If no candidate receives a majority for president then the House of Representatives will select the president, with each state delegation (instead of each representative) having only one vote.

Presidential Election at has some very interesting facts for trivia buffs.

The 2000 election was not the first time a candidate won the popular vote but lost the election. It has happened four times in our nation’s history:

  • In 1824 Andrew Jackson won the popular vote but got less than 50 percent of the electoral votes. John Quincy Adams became the next president when he was picked by the House of Representatives.
  • In 1876 Samuel Tilden won the popular vote but lost the election when Rutherford B. Hayes got 185 electoral votes to Tilden’s 184.
  • In 1888 Grover Cleveland won the popular vote but lost the election when Benjamin Harrison got 233 electoral votes to Cleveland’s 168.
  • In 2000 Al Gore won the popular vote but lost the election to George Bush. In the most highly contested election in modern history, the U.S. Supreme Court stopped the Florida recount of ballots, giving Bush the state’s 25 electoral votes for a total of 271 to Gore’s 255.

Victoria Woodhull became the first woman to run for President in 1872.

Hillary Clinton became the first woman to be nominated for president by a major party ticket in 2016.


So by the slenderest of threads, “we the people” have been able to set our country on a different more constitutionally based path again without firing a shot. By the narrowest of margins we have been able to prevent the loss of our country to some shadowy government located far away. We can’t get cocky in our back patting though, too much is still at stake and too many forces are out there determined to put a spanner in our efforts to move forward.


About Uriel

Retired educator and constitutionalist
Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Thank God Our ForeFathers Thought Ahead To Provide An Equalizer To Popular Vote

  1. Pingback: HN&F | Thank God Our ForeFathers Thought Ahead To Provide An Equalizer To Popular Vote | Brittius

  2. hocuspocus13 says:

    The popular vote was nothing more than Hillary Clinton winning states with a large population such as California and New York

    Versing smaller states with less people living in them or states with a lot of open land/acres used for farming or cattle ranching

    Trump won the majority of states I think it was 30 states

    It should be called Population Vote rather than Popular Vote

    • Uriel says:

      Really it does especially after all the ways found to put in a fix. Hey Hocuspocus thanks for commenting.

  3. I’m no expert at this, but my own observation occurred after reading about all the fraud votes that were being reported across the country from the machines flipping names as well as other forms of fraudulent actions…If we didn’t have the Electoral College votes, we would be fussing with all those reports of fraud votes now, instead of moving on with the Electoral College process.
    Though I do believe those votes still need to be investigated, this does make the process much simpler…

    • Uriel says:

      I’m with you Carol. Thank goodness for farsighted founders. Definitely heads should roll and laws changed to prevent some of these shady activities.

  4. Saltwater says:

    The Blue v Red comparison map is even more stark when viewed at county level.

    Take the State of New York for example. Clinton won its 29 electoral votes by getting 58.83% of some 7M votes (4.12M), compared to Trump’s 37.45% (2.62M).

    Yet, despite winning the state by over 1.5M votes, she only carried 16 of the state’s 62 counties. Of those counties Clinton won, just five around NYC accounted for almost 2.15M of her vote total.

    New York County – 87.17% of 591,4K votes
    Kings County – 79.74% of 746.3K votes
    Queens County – 75.5% of 626.0K votes
    Bronx County – 88,73% of 358.9K votes
    Westchester County – 64,91% of 378.5K votes

    Those five counties gave her 1.66M votes over Trump — enough to keep the state blue. Without the Electoral College, just one or two mega-cities could determine the fate of our entire nation.

    True, Clinton did edge out Trump by the slimmest of national popular vote margins (0.16%). But where would we be when such a close race, sans Electoral College, was surely contested.

    Imagine the fiasco of recounting some 126M votes — and they thought Florida 2000 was a mess.

  5. Outstanding post, Uriel. I missed it at first, or I wouldn’t have posted that other, more inferior, Electoral College piece. Well done!

    • Uriel says:

      Not to worry Grunt Great minds and long time blogging will have that happen. 🙂 Besides we came at it at different angles so even better..

  6. myfoxmystere says:

    I’m glad for the electoral college votes. It definitely keeps things in check.

    • Uriel says:

      At first I wasn’t myfox but seeing how this election unfolded, and reading more, I have learned how wonderful our forefathers were in adding this balance.