WikiLeaks – The Podesta Emails, Continuing the Clinton Saga


WikiLeaks Press Release

Today WikiLeaks begins its series on deals involving Hillary Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta. Mr Podesta is a long-term associate of the Clintons and was President Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff from 1998 until 2001. Mr Podesta also controls the Podesta Group, a major lobbying firm and is the Chair of the Center for American Progress (CAP), a Washington DC-based think tank. Part 1 of the Podesta Emails comprises 2,060 emails and 170 attachments and focuses on Mr Podesta’s communications relating to nuclear energy, and media handling over donations to the Clinton Foundation from mining and nuclear interests; 1,244 of the emails reference nuclear energy. (My emphasis) The full collection includes emails to and from Hillary Clinton.

In April 2015 the New York Times published a story about a company called “Uranium One” which was sold to Russian government-controlled interests, giving Russia effective control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for the production of nuclear weapons, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of US government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off the deal was the State Department, then headed by Secretary Clinton. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) comprises, among others, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy.

As Russian interests gradually took control of Uranium One millions of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation between 2009 and 2013 from individuals directly connected to the deal including the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer. Although Mrs Clinton had an agreement with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors to the Clinton Foundation, the contributions from the Chairman of Uranium One were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons.

When the New York Times article was published the Clinton campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, strongly rejected the possibility that then-Secretary Clinton exerted any influence in the US government’s review of the sale of Uranium One, describing this possibility as “baseless”.

Mr Fallon promptly sent a memo to the New York Times with a rebuttal of the story (Podesta Email ID 1489).

In this memo, Mr Fallon argued: “Apart from the fact that the State Department was one of just nine agencies involved in CFIUS, it is also true that within the State Department, the CFIUS approval process historically does not trigger the personal involvement of the Secretary of State. The State Department’s principal representative to CFIUS was the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs. During the time period in question, that position was held by Jose Fernandez. As you are aware, Mr Fernandez has personally attested that “Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter.”

What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053): “John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign”.

Five days after this email (22 April 2015), Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon wrote a memo to the New York Times, declaring that “Jose Fernandez has personally attested that ‘Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter’,” but Fallon failed to mention that Fernandez was hardly a neutral witness in this case, considering that he had agreed with John Podesta to play a role in the Clinton campaign.

The emails show that the contacts between John Podesta and Jose Fernandez go back to the time of internal Clinton campaign concern about the then-forthcoming book and movie “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer on the financial dealings of the Clinton Foundation.

In an email dated 29 March 2015 (Email ID 2059), Jose Fernandez writes to Podesta: “Hi John, I trust you are getting a brief rest after a job well done. Thanks no doubt to your recommendation I have joined the CAP [Center for American Progress] board of trustees, which I’m finding extremely rewarding.”

Julian Assange

Keep up with the latest in “Dark Shadows – the Clinton Series” HERE.


In case anyone missed the flap over Podesta.   Shakespeare would have produced had a great new dark play out of the life and times of the Clintons though George Orwell might have been closer to the truth.


About Uriel

Retired educator and constitutionalist
Tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to WikiLeaks – The Podesta Emails, Continuing the Clinton Saga

  1. Hardnox says:

    Podesta reminds me of a turtle out of his shell.

    This guy is a paid operative directly reporting to George Soros. Podesta was a the director of Soros funded Center for America Progress. He is/was also Obama’s Executive Order Czar who’s sole function was to circumvent our Constitution with these bullshit and illegal executive actions. Note the difference between Order and Action. Now he’s Hillary’s campaign czar. Good grief.

    The guy is a total socialist pos. Hillary is very desperate and so is Soros.

    I’m glad that WikiLeaks dumped the info but I doubt anything will become of it since the alphabet media is in non-report mode.

  2. Uriel says:

    I know. Whether anyone thinks Assange is right or not, he has opened the biggest can of worms ever. And unless or until Hillary and Bill are in the ground, I seriously doubt the rats on this ship will jump off. They have too much to lose. This is part of something far, far bigger than one group of criminals. The only way the walls come tumbling down is a major reset of those in the elitist towers around the world.

    • Hardnox says:

      True enough, much is at stake here. The biggest losers will be Soros and his fellow One World Travelers.

      Also, think about it this way with regards to Assange: If Hildabeast gets elected he’ll be droned or live in the Ecuadorian Embassy for at least 4-8 more years. If Trump gets elected, the dogs will be called off.