The ‘Pause’ In Global Warming Is Real; Now Even Michael Mann Throws Allies To Wolves

From: breitbart.com,  by James Delingpole,  on Feb 28, 2016,  see the article HERE.

Global warming hoax

With apologies to Clyde (come back Clyde!), this article is verifying what so many of us have been saying for years – Global Warming is a crock!

The “Pause” in global warming is real – not an urban myth concocted by evil ‘deniers’ – a study has found, signalling the development of a major schism within the climate alarmist camp.

“It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims,” the paper in Nature Climate Change says.

Though the paper’s findings are not controversial – few serious scientists dispute the evidence of the temperature datasets showing that there has been little if any global warming for nearly 19 years – they represent a tremendous blow to the climate alarmist “consensus”, which has long sought to deny the “Pause’s” existence.

First, the study was published in Nature Climate Change a fervently alarmist journal which rarely if ever runs papers that cast doubt on the man-made-global-warming scare narrative.

Secondly, it directly contradicts a widely-reported study produced by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) last year which attempted to deny the existence of the “Pause” (also known as the “hiatus”). This NOAA study was widely mocked, quickly debunked and is now the subject of a Congressional investigation by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) What’s novel about this new study in Nature Climate Change, though, is that it’s not skeptics and Republicans doing the mocking and the debunking: it’s the kind of people who in the past were very much in the alarmist camp, including – bizarrely – none other than Michael “Hockey Stick” Mann, who co-authored the paper.

What we have here, in other words, is signs of a major rift within the climate alarmist camp with different factions adopting different tactics to cope with the failure of their collapsing narrative.

On one side are people like Thomas Karl and Thomas Petersen, the hapless NOAA scientists given the unenviable task of producing that risible paper last year which did its best to deny that the Pause was a thing.

On the other are what might be called the “rats deserting the sinking ship” faction who have produced this new paper for Nature Climate Change, in which finally they concede what skeptics have been saying for many years: that there has been no “global warming” since 1998.

This divergence in the alarmist camp is now going to create a dilemma for all those liberal media outlets – from the BBC to the Guardian to the LA Times – which reported on NOAA’s “death of the pause” study as if it were a reliable and credible thing.

Are they now going to report on the counter-narrative? Or are they going to ignore it and hope no one notices?

The man who would like more than anyone to know the answer to this question is David Whitehouse, Science Editor of the Global Warming Policy Foundation and a former science editor at the BBC (till the point when his skepticism became too much for his employer).

That’s because in 2007, he was one of the first scientists to draw attention to the mysterious slowdown in global warming.

As he recalls in the Spectator:

In 2007 I pointed out that it was curious that in recent years the global annual average temperature had not increased at a time when greenhouse gasses were increasing rapidly and when the media was full of claims that the earth’s temperature was getting higher and higher. I proposed no explanation but said that it was a curious observation that would probably change in the near future. I was lambasted for being a denier and liar. Yet in the following years the global temperature did not increase.

Some vocal scientists spent more time saying it was wrong than actually looking at the data. While many in the media portrayed the phenomenon as a desperate weapon used by sceptics to undermine climate science, real scientists took notice and began to study the warming pause. It was not long before it was being discussed at conferences and in scientific journals. Something was clearly different about the nature of global temperature change since 1997 than it had been in the previous two decades. It was not only slower, but not increasing at all for many years. Indeed it was said in the prestigious scientific journal Nature that the “pause” or “hiatus” is the biggest problem in climate science.

Whitehouse is too polite to name the alarmist shills and activist attack dogs who have fought so hard over the years to discredit anyone who has dared suggest the existence of a Pause. So I will. But in a separate article. It seems to me that these people are so disgusting, corrupt, nauseating and malign that they shouldn’t simply be tacked on to the end of a news story. They should be made to perform the internet equivalent of Cersei’s Walk of Shame; or, at the very least, to be put in the stocks and pelted with excrement.

In the meantime let us all draw comfort from the fact that a) the alarmists are finally being forced to concede that their skeptic adversaries are right and b) that they are starting to turn on one another. This is the beginning of the end for the alarmist “consensus”. And not before time.

~~~~~~~~~~

These IPCC guys (Michael Mann included) have done an irreparable disservice to REAL climate scientists by their continuous, unrelenting push for the public to accept their politically-derived catastrophe scenario. If Global Warming had been accepted, the scientists and politicians would have created an almost unlimited fountain of funding. They’d have, via grants and taxes, an AMEX Black Card into the taxpayer’s bank accounts. After all, the poor unwashed masses, given a choice of keeping their hard-earned money or saving their asses, would choose survival every time. Talk about a money tree!

I can almost see Al Gore’s eyes light up at the Scrooge McDuck visions of the wealth that was “just around the corner.” Can’t you just see Al rolling around in his “money room” throwing bills into the air and swimming through cash?

But alas, there were a few skeptical scientists who balked at blind acceptance of something so detrimental to life on earth, that they chose to investigate further, and finding data that didn’t square with the alarmists, let the world know that all of the alarmist’s data wasn’t Kosher, in fact it was rancid.

Our thanks should go out to Mr. Delingpole, our Denier-in-Chief, for keeping us informed about the tricks and schemes used by the alarmists to sell a politically-driven concept to the public.

Garnet92.

 

Tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to The ‘Pause’ In Global Warming Is Real; Now Even Michael Mann Throws Allies To Wolves

  1. Uriel says:

    If big business and governments would get their slimy mitts out of the GeoEngineering business a LOT of current human, animal, and plant ailments as well as climate would slow. They should be held responsible in trillions of dollars in damages and loss of lives from their meddling.

  2. tannngl says:

    The red flag is any time someone says “The science is settled!”

    Science is never settled. Else we would never have atomic power.

    Good post, Garnet.
    Where is Cyde!?

  3. CW says:

    Delingpole: ”They should be made to perform the internet equivalent of Cersei’s Walk of Shame; or, at the very least, to be put in the stocks and pelted with excrement.”

    I vote for the latter suggestion because that sounds like it might be pretty effective (and very entertaining!).

    There is no accountability for the failures or shameful behaviors of liberals, progressives or leftwingers when it comes to climate alarmism or anything else. As long as that continues to be the case, they will lie, cheat, ignore the truth and engage in personal attacks to discredit anyone who challenges them. It’s that simple.

    Thanks for stepping in where Clyde left off, Garnet!

  4. upaces88 says:

    Scalia’s Death Means For Obama’s Global Warming Agenda
    The tragic death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia already has pundits guessing how this will affect pending court decisions, including a case that could determine the fate of President Barack Obama’s global warming agenda.

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/15/heres-what-scalias-death-means-for-obamas-global-warming-agenda/#ixzz41Vnli874

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/15/heres-what-scalias-death-means-for-obamas-global-warming-agenda/#ixzz41Vnf76oV

  5. upaces88 says:

    The motive: $22 billion per year.
    To be clear . . . that’s $22 billion of taxpayers’ money . . . the amount that our government pays to stop the “global warming” epidemic.

    That comes out to $41,856 every minute.

    Or, to put it in perspective, that is twice as much as what our government spends on securing our borders.

    Then, imagine this top U.S. intelligence agent turning to you, and asking for you to join him on a mission to out those involved in the “global warming” lie.

    Continue Reading:

    http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/MKTNews/Global-Warming-climate-change/2014/11/17/id/607827/

  6. Hardnox says:

    Excellent piece Garnet. Take a bow. It’s good to see this fraud collapsing, albeit too slowly. There’s too much money in it to die a slow death.

  7. BrianR says:

    As we all know, “climate change science” is a form of religion for leftist hysterics and fascists. Bowing at the altar of Gaia and an endless flow of money and power.

    And like most religions, it’s reached a point of doctrinal schism. Think Catholicism and Protestantism.

    May they turn on each other and devour themselves like the cannibals they are.