From:,  by Ben Shapiro,  on Sep 18, 2015,  see the article HERE.  Emphasis is mine.


The hubbub surrounding Irving, Texas 14-year-old MacArthur High School student Ahmed Mohammed – the kid who brought a homemade clock-in-a-case that looked like a fake bomb to school – continues apace, with the President of the United States inviting him to the White House, and 2016 Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg tweeting out encouragement.

There’s only one problem: the whole story smells. It stinks of leftist exploitation.

Here’s what we know. On Monday, Mohammed brought a homemade clock to school. For those who don’t know the ins-and-outs of electronics, the device looked like a possible incendiary device. Ahmed told the media that he made the clock last weekend and brought it to school to show his engineering teacher. He explained to local news, “It was the first time I brought an invention to school to show a teacher.”

He didn’t explain that to police, however, according to the authorities. And he didn’t just show the device to his engineering teacher. In fact, the engineering teacher told him not to carry the device around after Mohammed showed him, according to The New York Times:

He said he took it to school on Monday to show an engineering teacher, who said it was nice but then told him he should not show the invention to other teachers. Later, Ahmed’s clock beeped during an English class, and after he revealed the device to the teacher, school officials notified the police, and Ahmed was interrogated by officers. “She thought it was a threat to her,” Ahmed told reporters Wednesday. “So it was really sad that she took a wrong impression of it.”

Why was the device in English class in the first place, especially after the engineering teacher told him not to show it around? When confronted by police and his English teacher, why didn’t Mohammed just tell them to talk to the engineering teacher? When police asked Ahmed what the device was and why he brought it to school, according to WFAA:

Officers said Ahmed was being “passive aggressive” in his answers to their questions, and didn’t have a “reasonable answer” as to what he was doing with the case. Investigators said the student told them that it was just a clock that he was messing around with. “We attempted to question the juvenile about what it was and he would simply only say it was a clock. He didn’t offer any explanation as to what it was for, why he created this device, why he brought it to school,” said James McLellan, Irving Police.

Here’s the statute Ahmed Mohammed authorities originally suspected Mohammed of violating (Texas Penal Code Section 46.08):

(a) A person commits an offense if the person knowingly manufactures, sells, purchases, transports, or possesses a hoax bomb with intent to use the hoax bomb to:

(1) make another believe that the hoax bomb is an explosive or incendiary device; or

(2) cause alarm or reaction of any type by an official of a public safety agency or volunteer agency organized to deal with emergencies.

(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.

Nobody said Mohammed built an actual bomb. They suspected that he had wanted to frighten or alarm officials with a hoax-bomb. When they found out he didn’t intend to do that, they released him.

Given the limited evidence available, this is not far-fetched. Again, where was the engineering teacher to vouch for Mohammed’s story? Why didn’t Mohammed simply explain himself? The police said that initially, it was “not immediately evident” that the clock-in-a-case was a class experiment – perfectly plausible, given that Mohammed built the clock-in-a-case voluntarily, without assignment, and in conjunction with no science fair.

Chief Larry Boyd said simply and correctly, “You can’t take things like that to school” without explanation or assignment in today’s world without it receiving scrutiny.

And according to the cops, Ahmed was significantly more cooperative with friendly media than with the police who came to ask some simple questions.

That’s probably not a coincidence. Ahmed’s father, as Pamela Geller points out, is an anti-Islamophobia media gadfly. He routinely returns to Sudan to run for president; he has debated anti-Koran Florida pastor Terry Jones, partially in order to bring his children to Disneyworld. In 2011, the Washington Post wrote of him:

Elhassan, a native of the Sudan who is now an American citizen, likes to call himself a sheik. He wears a cleric’s flowing white robes and claims hundreds of followers throughout Egypt, Sudan and in the United States. But he is unknown as a scholar or holy man in the state he has called home for two decades. Religious leaders in Texas say they have never heard of Elhassan, including the imam at the mosque where he worships.

It’s no surprise that Ahmed Mohammed’s dad ran to the cameras at the first opportunity. It’s also no surprise that the terror-connected Council on American-Islamic Relations arrived to push the Islamophobia narrative immediately.

But there’s a long history of detaining science students for experiments administrators don’t understand. Homer Hickam, the subject of the movie October Sky, found himself in handcuffs during the Cold War for starting a forest fire with a rocket he built. And since September 11, such incidents have become more common. As someone who went to a Jewish high school based in Los Angeles and located next to the Simon Wiesenthal Center, police and security regularly evacuated our high school due to bomb threats. If one of the students had brought a device to school in this fashion, the student would have been detained and questioned – again, in an all-Jewish school.

And as Ian Tuttle of National Review has pointed out, America has become extra-paranoid of late: students have been suspended for gun-shaped Pop Tarts, cap guns, finger guns, and saying the word gun, among other grave offenses. And we don’t even need weapons to suspend students anymore: wearing an American flag at the wrong time or donning a Confederate flag t-shirt will do it.

So why, after the detention and release, did this story become a national one? Why did Obama jump on this story? Why did Hillary jump on this story? Where were they for then-16-year-old Kiera Wilmot of Florida to the White House after she was arrested and suspended in 2013 for bringing an experiment with toilet cleaner and aluminum foil to school? She was black but not Muslim, so it didn’t serve the narrative. They were MIA.

For years, the Obama administration has pushed the notion that American Muslims are in danger of Islamophobic backlash. But as of 2012, 62.4 percent of all anti-religious hate crimes targeted Jews; 11.6 percent targeted Muslims; as of 2013, anti-Jewish hate crimes represented 60.3 percent of all hate crimes, as opposed to just 13.7 percent for Muslims. That’s a major decline in anti-Islamic hate crimes since 2001, when 55.7 percent of hate crimes were anti-Jewish, and anti-Muslim hate crimes constituted 27.2 percent of all hate crimes.

So where, exactly, are all the invitations to Jewish students targeted in hate crime incidents?

They don’t exist, because they don’t help President Obama castigate America as xenophobic and backwards – and just as importantly, castigate Texans as particularly likely to don white hoods and go hunt down some Sufis.

The narrative reigns supreme. Ahmed Mohammed brought a clock-in-a-case that looked like a hoax bomb to the uninformed to school; his engineering teacher told him not to show it around; he showed it around; the police showed up, and he was allegedly uncooperative; they decided he was innocent and released him.

That’s not a national scandal. That’s local cops and teachers and administrators doing their jobs, decently but cautiously. Yet that won’t be what you hear. You’ll just hear that America hates Muslims, even as Americans self-righteously tweet out #IStandWithAhmed without hearing the facts.


And from another story (also on available HERE, I excerpt a few additional thoughts by Pamela Geller:

When I first heard about this story, I wrote at my website that it smelled fishy. Now, as more details have emerged, it positively stinks. The plot has considerably thickened. In what has become one of the most egregious of the faked hate narratives, the bomb hoax clockster turns out to come from a family that has a history of supremacist stunts.

Mohamed ElHassan Mohamed has been looking for publicity and chances to fight against “Islamophobia” for a considerable period. Now he has seized it, going so far as to claim his son was “tortured” by school and law enforcement officials.

Ahmed’s device caused alarm and fear, and he was detained for having what his teacher perceived as a bomb. Police officers said the electronic components and wires inside his Vaultz pencil case (which is the size of a briefcase) looked like a “hoax bomb,” according to local news station WFAA.

This story is pure agitprop most fatal. “If you see something, say something” is now racism. And for destroying this simple principle of self-protection, young Ahmed Mohamed is a media star. Not only has Barack Obama invited him to the White House, but NASA has also invited Ahmed to meet with them, as has Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook. The whole thing has clearly been a setup, and its effect will be to make Americans less safe. If you ever see a Muslim with a suspicious object, remember the lesson of Ahmed Mohamed: to say something would be “racism.” That could end up being the epitaph of America and the free world.


This later reporting certainly clears up a lot of the confusion that was natural when the story first broke. The early picture I saw showed only Ahmed holding a circuit board with some wires showing – it didn’t look particularly menacing.

ahmed-mohamed clock

However, when we’re able to see the actual device as it appeared inside the briefcase, it does present a different picture. I view this episode much like the initial pictures of Trayvon Martin – those showing a cherubic pre-teen choirboy when in actuality, he was much more and the early pictures were to establish a preconceived perception of innocence.

So it is with this case. When seen from the perspective of the teachers and the police, a briefcase containing electronics (no matter how benign) is suspicious and needs to be dealt with accordingly – as the authorities did. The boy’s ethnicity did play a part. A short, fat, bespectacled white kid probably wouldn’t have raised the alarm flag so high, but let’s be real – terror bombers are a lot more likely to be Muslim and named Ahmed than a white kid named Stephen. The kid brought it on himself. He should have stored the briefcase in his locker after the engineering teacher told him that he shouldn’t be showing it around and then he also could have been more cooperative with police. He’s no doubt been indoctrinated by his dad to mistrust infidel police.

This incident shouldn’t have warranted more than a small blurb in a local news report – until the Muslim-in-chief chose to escalate the issue for political reasons.

Which prompts the question: is there any reason that Obama does ANYTHING other than for political reasons?




Tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.


  1. Kathy says:

    Practical people without an agenda will this from the teacher’s and principal’s perspective. They’re responsible for the kids around them and when one of them possibly endangers them all, they have to assume the worse and take action.

    Those with a political agenda will turn it into the next Trayvon or Michael Brown moment and as you said, what should have been a minor incident becomes national news.

    Another thing I found odd about this was that the kid didn’t make the normal kid stuff like a robot, or a drone, or even a fire-breathing dragon – he made a clock. Then he put it in an odd looking case. Subconsciously or not, he had influence from somewhere.

    • Garnet92 says:

      Recognize that I’m writing this reply well after the facts have become known, but nothing you said is diminished – it’s all still right-on. And I agree about the influence. I suspect that his dad had a part in this.

  2. Uriel says:

    Good post. It’s called indoctrination and lesson. If enough “media” hype is applied three things happen: 1- as you said the public is taught fear of reprisal, a oft used Nazi tactic to instill a concept of suppression 2- preparing the way for Real incidents by numbing the populace to several fakes. Like the Boy Who Cried Wolf. 3-to create a setting which adults begin to be paranoid on all levels this striking at the heart of parental trauma. As to O—many incidents while seemingly innocent and far from WH have found their way to national push and executive actions at least 6 months prior to an executive statement or more instrumental national focus. case in hand–a seemingly innocent and unrelated suit filed in Colorado and awarded by a liberal leaning federal judge concerning Christian prejudice and harassment at a military enlistment 6 months or so prior too chaplains being suppressed in the military then massive pushes months later and military change in policy concerning religion in military.

    The young man in question in Colorado? Online supposition (later removed from Internet) traced back to the son of a man heading a group who “advised” military on public image. He in turn had alleged ties to Islam and alleged ties to Obama. That is one of several since O took office which appeared unrelated but somehow wound up involved in government “concepts” and have been swiftly removed from public awareness.

    • Garnet92 says:

      As you say Uriel, it’s the old “Boy who cried wolf” thing all over again. Just get us lulled to sleep by multiple cases of what might LOOK like overreaction so that we lighten up – and BANG! a real briefcase bomb goes off in a school.

      We’d better not relax our guard. The authorities did nothing wrong in this case and I’d hope that they do exactly the same thing again if a similar incident happens.

  3. Hardnox says:

    Thanks for posting this.

  4. tannngl says:

    I thought this whole story sounded strange as well.
    Now with this new information that most of America will never hear, I know this was ‘leftist exploitation’. Poor Muslims…so mistreated.

    • Garnet92 says:

      You’re right tannngl, the vast majority of those who are raising hell about this case of “discrimination” won’t bother to continue to follow it and learn the truth. Those are our opponents in the arena of thought and politics.