Who Had Access to Hillary’s Classified Emails?

Beside the ChiCom government hackers and Putin’s neo-KGB, the FSB.

There can be little doubt, despite protestations to the contrary by Camp Clinton, that classified documents on Clinton’s personal email server have been compromised.  To what extent can only be determined by following the “chain of custody” from originator to each person having even incidental contact with those documents.

As reported by Richard Pollock at Daily Caller, that chain may be very long indeed.

Hillarymail ‘Chain of Custody’ Request May Lead To Indictments


Department of State officials refused to identify to a congressional committee the “chain of custody” – the complete list of people who had access to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server, according to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s investigation.

The request was made last spring by the House Select Committee on Benghazi probing the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in which Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were murdered.

The chain of custody evidence is essential to determining if Clinton or people close to her violated federal laws on handling of classified materials.

In a private meeting earlier this year between the State Department, Clinton’s representative and Benghazi committee staff, the committee asked State to identify the “chain of custody” of people who “touched” or otherwise had access to Clinton’s email and to additional copies, according to a knowledgeable congressional source.

The materials were sought “in order to identify those persons who had touched them and then for us to determine who might have violated classified handling procedures. And we got nothing,” the source said.

Once again, the State Department is running interference for Clinton.  That DoS officials have made every effort to stymie Judicial Watch FOIA requests concerning Benghazi and the email scandal is bad enough.  Telling Congress to pack sand in regards to national security concerns, just to cover Clinton’s ample hindquarters, is borderline treasonous.

The “chain of custody” issue is important as federal officials have confirmed that at least 300 or more emails on Clinton’s server contained highly sensitive classified material and at least two were stamped “Top Secret,” the highest classification level within the intelligence community.

The Top Secret designation means information disclosed in that category “could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security,” according to Executive Order 13526, a December 2009 national security order signed by President Barack Obama.

As more is disclosed about the server or servers, the circle of people who came in contact with Clinton’s emails grows larger by the day.

In addition to close Clinton aides with access to her Chappaqua, N.Y., home where the private server was located, the committee is focusing its attention on attorneys from the Williams & Connolly law firm where David Kendall is “of counsel.”

Kendall is a long-time Clinton lawyer and confidante who represents the former secretary of state on the email server investigation.

Clinton gave Kendall a thumb drive with more than 30,000 State Department emails. He reportedly instructed his staff to review the thumb drive and print out hard copies for the department.

“We do know it was Kendall’s subordinates — the names for which we do not know — who did that search. But we don’t know who they are to this day,” the congressional source said.

Further revelations on the handling of Clinton emails may lead to the death of Williams & Connolly, all because Kendall’s blithe disregard for security requirements when in control of classified materials.  I say disregard because Kendall is well aware of those requirements, having held clearances before, including when he was counsel for former CIA Director David Petraeus when the later was under investigation for mishandling of classified documents.

Kendall has maintained that he enjoyed a security clearance because of his work with Petraeus, but the congressional source told The DCNF that, “I’d be floored if the attorneys had it for the review.”

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley told Kendall in a letter made public Monday that “it appears the FBI has determined that your clearance is not sufficient to allow you to maintain custody of the emails.”

The Iowa Republican noted that Kendall received the emails in December 2014, but it was only in May of this year that the State Department delivered a classified materials-certified safe to store the thumb drives.

After it was disclosed that “Top Secret” classified information was on the hard drive, Kendall was ordered to build a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, or SCIF, at Williams & Connolly. A SCIF is a hardened room with very secure restrictions for access.

Grassley added, “since at least May 2015 and possibly December 2014, it appears that in addition to not having an adequate security clearance, you did not have the appropriate tools in place to secure the thumb drives.”

Problems for Williams & Connolly do not stop with inadequate physical security at the law firm’s office.  There is still the major issue of how, where, and by whom those hard copies of Clinton emails were created for surrender to the State Department.

Other parties may have had unauthorized access to the Clinton materials if Kendall printed out the emails using either a commercial printing company or an unsecured Williams & Connolly copier machine.

To print out 30,000 paper emails, “it seems likely that [Kendall] would have contracted a commercial printing firm and then as a result, that has now been exposed to someone else,” observed Alex McGeorge, the head of threat intelligence at Immunity, Inc.

Even if Williams & Connolly printed out the 30,000 emails in-house, the best copiers are really computers with large storage capacity that would keep the classified information, McGeorge said.

This is perhaps the most troubling aspect of the Clinton email FLAILEX.  Not only did Kendall distribute materials even the most inept should have suspected were at least ‘sensitive’ in nature among his subordinates within the law firm walls, he may have outsourced their reproduction to some unknown mouth breathers at the local Kinkos.  The potential for damage is extreme.  How extreme?


The highly sensitive nature of the material was confirmed by the inspector general for the Intelligence Community last month.

The IG, I. Charles McCullough, found at least two emails were classified “Top Secret/SI/TK/NOFORM.”

SI stands for “Special Intelligence,” meaning it was the product of an intercepted communication. TK represents “Talent Keyhole,” confirming the communication or image was obtained by satellite.

In court papers filed last Friday with U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras, the State Department conceded that as intelligence officials undertook a new review of Clinton’s emails, as many as 305 were identified as falling under some form of classification.

Jed Babbin, a former undersecretary for Defense under President George H. W. Bush, said the SI/TK classification is one of the highest clearances within the U.S. government and requires special approval.

“The stuff we’re talking about is SI/TK. It doesn’t matter if you have the clearance or not. You have to be cleared into the specific part of intelligence to do that.

“This is really, really serious,” he said, if it was “divulged to the public or to an enemy power they would be most likely to severely damage the United States. Not just to damage the United States. It would severely damage the United States. So this is big.”

Depending on the exact nature of the information compromised, Babbin’s characterization, “this is big,” may be the mother of all understatements.  OK, it may not be Julius and Ethel Rosenberg big, but it could potentially eclipse Wikileaks.  It is no wonder that people involved are scrambling to hide that “chain of custody.”  They may soon become acquainted with another type of custody involving chains.



Dennis P. O’Neil



Tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Who Had Access to Hillary’s Classified Emails?

  1. Kathy says:

    Why was there no deadline or retribution to the State employees who refused to provide information to the Benghazi committee?

    Clinton gave Kendall the thumb drive in Dec, but he didn’t get the safe until May, so for all we know that drive could have been stored in his desk drawer with possibly immeasurable access. Already some in his staff have seen what’s on it and who did they possibly share information with?

    Then to bring in the possibility of an outside printing source just widens the circle. This has the potential to spread farther and faster than the Ebola virus did. Practically everybody’s seen what’s on that drive except the committee.

  2. Garnet92 says:

    Great stuff Dennis! There is one aspect of this email “scandal” that is extremely troubling to me. We, the public as well as the media, are treating this as one more misstep by Hillary Clinton; just another slip-up, another nail in her political coffin.

    But, we’re talking about the NATIONAL SECURITY of the United States here – this transcends politics. Who, among our enemies, has had access to our state secrets? Even seemingly innocuous ones related to diplomatic methods or plans for negotiations can be damaging to our country. Who’s to say that Iran didn’t have information about our diplomatic positions when Hillary was Secretary of State that may have affected Kerry’s negotiations?

    Wouldn’t it be advantageous for Russia, China, North Korea and Iran to know about information that was passed around at the highest levels while Hillary was SOS?

    My point is: it’s time that WE, the people began to view Hillary’s email episode as more than just Hillary protecting herself from prosecution for channeling funds to Bill through the Foundation – that could be “chicken-feed” compared to information gleaned by our enemies that could be extremely damaging (even lethal) to the United States. Playing fast and loose with national security ought to be dealt with as TREASON, nothing less.

  3. Hardnox says:

    Good post. Anyone with a security clearance that was this reckless with classified documents would be in the graybar hotel already.

    Look for Hildabeast to blame it on a subordinate while claiming she knew nothing. The reality is that SHE had a private server for the explicit purpose of preventing any scrutiny of her activities while performing her duties as an appointed and duly sworn in public servant. End of story.

  4. Kathy says:

    This might explain why the Benghazi committee is hitting a stone wall with the State Dept.


  5. Grouchy says:

    Hardnox said it well. This is wholly atrocious, and this boetsch has been thumbing her nose at security and patriotism since the days of Watergate. She should be caged, until she sings like a canary.Then tried for espionage, or treason.