Secret Arrivals of Immigrants Near You


“We only need to look to a troubled Europe to see where we are headed.”

“In this unsettling video Ann Corcoran explains how she stopped the U.S. State Department from dumping thousands of Muslim refugees in her small Maryland town — a Mulsim refugee relocation program that has  been taking place behind our backs for over 30 years.

She also explains that the program is facilitated be a Koran based organization call “The Organization Of Islamic Cooperation.” The immigration is funded by the U.S. Federal government to the tune of hundreds of millions of our dollars. “We are paying for our own demise.”

According to Corcoran: “We only need to look to a troubled Europe to see the path ahead for America if we can’t stop this migration and stop it soon,” Corcoran stated. She goes on to tell us that “hijra” or spreading Islam through immigration, is part of the Islamic plan for “destroying Western civilization from within.”

“Soon, we will be settling Syria Muslims in large numbers.

The U.N. at the moment has over 10,000 in a pipeline destined for our towns.

The FBI told Congress recently they cannot be properly screened.”

“If you don’t help counter the hijra, we are in my opinion, doomed,” she said (H/T Breitbart). “Ann Corcoran’s report is required reading for anyone worried about the threat to America from the global jihad movement,” said Frank Gaffney, president of the Center for Security Policy group.


In my posts titled “Islam and Shariah Can Not Co-Exist in Western Countries”, I mentioned how immigrants are being shuffled (required) by United Nations really to be split between all countries. Some of the countries are having problems with the deluge. The United States is also being required to receive people in this new wave. Instead of being upfront (which might get a lot of backlash), Obama and his henchmen/women are going quietly into towns assessing, then organizing, and finally installing WITHOUT public awareness and often without state knowledge. In cases where there actually are objections things get nasty as suddenly threats of loss of funding and grants start surfacing.

Here are some warning signs of imminent immigrant arrivals in no particular order:

1) You suddenly find out your governor or mayor has written a letter (after the fact) INVITING the arrival of interested immigrants
2) Your officials, state or local, suddenly voice objections to “secret” arrivals
3) When people ask government agencies and are stonewalled until day of arrival
4) When local families suddenly have larger than normal food bills and are accompanied by a newcomer
5) when new offices with little fanfare or signage begin opening in your area
6) when government job opening for your area mention interpreters or community organizers
7) when Obama’s administration sends letters to state or local officials asking about areas
8) when the poorest, most troubled areas notice a large influx of new people moving in
9) billboards appear in your area appear talking about community diversity
10) local radio or tv stations also run diversity ads
11) City Council suddenly publishes a “Welcome Proclamation”
12) Local libraries start hosting events on diversity
13) New HUD housing springs up seemingly overnight without using normal channels
14) References to National Council for Muslims (Migrants), National Partnership for New Americans, World Relief Organization, or community action agencies start cropping up
15) Illinois, Michigan, Massachusetts, or New York sends representatives to help your state get ready

These are only a few Hints.

What can you do singly, very little, yet very important:
—  Comb internet,

—  get educated,

—  contact state representatives,
—  push congressmen.

— Refugee Resettlement Watch may be a good place to start.
— Or local/state prepare/aware groups



About Uriel

Retired educator and constitutionalist
Tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

30 Responses to Secret Arrivals of Immigrants Near You

  1. Ronnie says:

    Reagan made Amnesty a bedrock conservative principle.

    • Uriel says:

      hi Ronnie. Thanks for stopping by. Democrats specifically Obama tend to put that spin. What Reagan did was write a EO that was concurrent and specifically worded to mirror a congressional Immigration Law of 1965. He put brakes on the actual laws open border no limited words. Prior to that law there were specific limits to incoming which allowed for proper checks.

    • Hardnox says:

      Ronnie, thanks for the visit but that is an ancient lefty yarn. Reagan agreed to a degree of amnesty in exchange for increased border security promised by the D’s but was then screwed after the legislation was passed. That is simply a matter of recorded history. Look it up.

      • Ronnie says:

        Hardnox, your spin doesn’t work in the internet age…see below.

        • Hardnox says:

          I hear an echo…

          I’m not attempting to spin anything. You might want to get off your high horse Ronnie.

          Reagan did not want to deport, at that time, 5 million illegals. It had been done twice before under Truman and Eisenhower. The D’s wanted blanket amnesty and offered border security. Then the D’s reneged after amnesty was passed.

          Ditto with GW Bush. The Dims agreed to heightened border security including a physical fence and a “virtual fence” via surveillance then promptly defunded it in ’06

          The problem now is we have a flood of illegals and no border security plus Putt has thrown out the welcome mat for the invaders. Further, the “virtual fence” is gone and the Border patrol has been ordered back 40 miles from the border, which is insane.

          Today’s problem isn’t what occurred 30 years ago. The problem is what has happened and continues since “the Won” has been in office and the fact that the entirety of the left (whether republican or democrat) simply refuses to stem the tide of invaders.

  2. Clyde says:

    Good post, Uriel. Ronnie, DO. SOME. RESEARCH.

  3. Ronnie says:

    Conservatives, your spin doesn’t work in the internet age…its too easy to prove that you’re wrong:

    “I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and lived here, even though sometime back they may have entered illegally”

    –Reagan (in a televised debate with Democratic presidential nominee Walter Mondale in 1984.)

    …in 1986, Ronald Reagan signed a sweeping immigration reform bill into law…[the] 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act…

    YouTube proof of Reagan using the word “AMNESTY” (he also blames American business for illegal immigration and sounds rather socialist w/his handwringing over illegal being exploited by big, bad, evil American business):

  4. Kathy says:

    Nice try, Ronnie, using the typical leftie tactics of taking the conversation off topic. This post has nothing to do with Reagan or what happened then – it has to do with what’s happening now in O’s legacy-making career and the moves he’s making to kill our country.

    Your comment about our spin is wrong – there is no spin and the burden of proof isn’t on us. Speak to the topic – prove Ann Corcoran wrong, then we’ll talk.

    • Uriel says:

      Kathy is right. This is as it should be about here and now. I did not need a back to the future thing. That particular immigrant amnesty was a “controlled” effort. APPROVED and in conjunction with Congress water long drunk and the person was respected across the world.

      This is about unrestrained, concerted planned effort by one man to circumvent and claim himself a legacy as ruler. He has not at any point lived up to his oath of office and has put our country in harms way, stripped any creditability we have, all while alienating us with our long time allies. His name is mud across the world because he can not lead except by deceit.

      • Ronnie says:

        Uriel, Reagan used amnesty (as well as mandating ‘free’ emergency room care for all–including illegals) to further his legacy and your side nearly worships him…why can’t Obama do the same?

        • Uriel says:

          IF RONNIE, WE could believe Obama truly had the United States and it’s legacy at the heart of his efforts it would certainly be easier. However, in front of the UN and throughout his life Obama has been a staunch Muslim who follows Islam and part of the Communist Party movement. In their own rights NEITHER accept or encourage freedom of life, liberty to suceed or fail, or a democratic form of government where citizens have some say in how the governing group draws up laws. They both are a poor performers in any and all of those categories. Frankly neither form of those would allow you to comment any more than I. Neither would allow dozens of independent small businesses to spring up. I could go on but you get the idea. So no, citizens who grew up with respect, loyalty, and morals can not accept that this man Obama has earned the rights that Reagan did. We laughed and mocked Reagan at times but we’re NEVER doubtful of his patriotism and loyalty to our country. Obama is first and foremost determined to bring the world under ONE government
          So long as I am able I will fight to keep freedom and country independent UNDER GOD.

    • Ronnie says:

      Oh, I agree that unchecked immigration isn’t desirable…I just find it ironic that Conservatives’ God (Reagan) is more responsible than any other one person for the MILLIONS of illegals here.

      Democrats owe Reagan a HUGE debt of gratitude…w/o his AMNESTY they likely would’ve become a permanent minority Party…instead the few % boost illegals and their offspring have given (which will increase over the years to come) the DP has been the decisive difference in who-knows how many elections…hell due to RR’s AMNESTY, California (Reagan’s home state ironically), went from solidly Republican to overwhelmingly Democrat in the space of a generation…

  5. Bullright says:

    This nonsensical agenda must be stopped. That they can do it clandestine is unbelievable. Those warning signs are red flags has to be intentional secretive

    Who’s the guy promotiing the “Immigration and Stabilization Act” in ’94 to limit all immigration and stop amnesty?

  6. Ronnie says:

    Its also odd that people SO concerned w/illegal immigration handed the nomination to Juan McAmnesty in 2008…and then nominated this turd in 2012:

    Rush Limbaugh Shocked by Romney Amnesty Embrace

    • Uriel says:

      The issue is not amnesty so much ad irresponsible uncontrolled open borders allowing for terror groups and those who would bring us down free reign to do so. Not one person in our country can utter bad things about any who would come to seek a better life. We each hail from an immigrant background. There are wonderful, hardworking members of many countries who have fled here to escape tyranny and death. A all deserve that chance if they follow rules and willingly become citizens. Illegals, some of whom are good people, are not following those rules. Society requires some order in order to flourish but those unable or unwilling also coming through. They want only chaos to reign. That is the main problem. Ask many who come and find out Why they chose to leave homes and family in a country of birth. Be willing to try to understand not criticize the small things Until you get that understanding.

  7. Bullright says:

    Oh please, its about de facto open borders, and we all know it. Something Reagan opposed adamantly. And I see the mystery Reagan poster never addressed the subject of the post. But it’s par for the course.

  8. Ronnie says:

    Well, I have to conclude that you people aren’t anti-immigration, just anti-Obama.

    And WOW…Uriel calling him a “communist muslim”…talk about unbalanced…

    • Bullright says:

      Is it always either or….. as in a false choice.?

    • Kathy says:

      Ronnie, we support the 1A, so you can come in here and bash republicans, you can bash Romney, Reagan, whoever you choose, and you can even take your comments off topic, but the one thing you cannot do on the site is bash other people.

      That is simply not tolerated, so one more comment like that and you will be bounced.

    • Uriel says:

      You obviously have Not done your due diligence. try looking up his history and addresses to UN. I speak truth when I know it is truth. Not so you. Ranting to be visible is childish.

  9. Bullright says:

    So Reid was anti-Clinton, who knew?

  10. Bullright says:

    Why would what is going on in this agenda be about Reagan anyway? Reagan tried to work with Congress, a completely different scenario. But when you are wrong, well, you are wrong.