Benghazi probe likely to extend into 2016 – Hillary’s not happy

  Benghazi continues to haunt Hillary Clinton with probe likely to extend into 2016

From: washingtontimes.com, by: David Sherfinski, on: April 22, 2015, see the article HERE.  Bold emphasis is Garnet92’s.

Hillary email cartoon

The special panel investigating the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi indicated Wednesday that its inquiry could continue into next year, as House Speaker John A. Boehner said the Obama administration has made it “virtually impossible” to get to the bottom of what happened.

If the panel does extend into next year, it could cause a political headache for Hillary Rodham Clinton, whose presidential campaign would be in full swing. She also has faced questions over her role in overseeing the diplomatic post that came under attack on Sept. 11, 2012, when she was secretary of state.

Mrs. Clinton may have set back the timetable even further after her attorney wrote a letter to the investigative panel saying she does not intend to meet Chairman Trey Gowdy’s request that she testify twice: once in a private transcribed interview and later in a public hearing.

Mrs. Clinton announced her bid for president last week and has dodged questions from reporters on the campaign trail about her role in deciding the levels of security at the diplomatic compound in Benghazi and the administration’s initial response in blaming the attack on an anti-Islam video rather than on terrorists.

“They could clean this up a whole lot quicker if the administration and former Secretary Clinton were in a position to actually cooperate with the committee and turn over the kind of information that we’ve been seeking for some time,” Mr. Boehner told reporters. “But the administration has made it virtually impossible to get to the facts surrounding Benghazi. And so when we have the facts, we’ll have a report.”

Mr. Gowdy has said he hopes the panel can finish its work by the end of this year. But a spokesman for the committee warned that timeline could slip with potential delays arising from factors “beyond the committee’s control.”

“Factors beyond the committee’s control, including witness availability, compliance with documents requests, the granting of security clearances and accreditations — all of which are controlled by the executive branch — could continue to impact the timing of the inquiry’s conclusion,” said panel spokesman Jamal Ware.

Mr. Gowdy wants Mrs. Clinton to testify to his committee twice.

The first appearance would be for a transcribed interview on her decision to reject a State Department-issued email address and instead set up her own server and account, which she used to conduct official business.

He then would have her testify before the committee in a public hearing to answer questions about Libya and the 2012 attack.

She has insisted she followed the rules, and said she didn’t write about classified information from that account. In a letter to Mr. Gowdy on Wednesday, her attorney, David E. Kendall, wrote that she already has publicly answered the questions about her email use.

Mr. Kendall said Mrs. Clinton is willing to attend a public hearing and that there is “no reason to delay” that appearance by first asking her to testify in private.

Her attorney has also rejected Mr. Gowdy’s request that her email server be turned over to a third-party arbiter, and said Mrs. Clinton had the server wiped clean after she turned over the emails she deemed proper.

The former secretary of state explained last month before Mr. Gowdy’s request that she used her own email server out of convenience, and said she turned over approximately 30,000 emails she deemed work-related to the State Department in December — nearly two years after she left office.

Democrats on the committee said a public hearing should be scheduled at once.

“Rather than drag out this political charade into 2016 and selectively leak portions of a closed-door interview, the committee should schedule the public hearing, make her records public, and refocus its efforts on the attacks in Benghazi,” said Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, Maryland Democrat and ranking member on the committee.

Mr. Gowdy said in a statement that more questions remain and that the committee now has thousands of pages of documents from an accountability review board about the attack that no other committee has had access to and that they expect more documents to be produced by the State Department in the days ahead.

Those documents and others, as well as interviews with witnesses who have not been questioned, will aid the committee as it prepares to invite Mrs. Clinton to appear, Mr. Gowdy said.

He said the committee plans to issue a response Thursday “setting out a reasonable path forward with respect to Secretary Clinton’s appearances to discuss both Benghazi as well as congressional efforts to ensure the public record is complete with respect to her tenure as secretary of state.”

Mrs. Clinton refused to answer questions about Benghazi when confronted Tuesday night by a reporter from the The (London) Daily Mail.

“Mrs. Clinton, when are you going to start talking to the press about Benghazi? Did you make mistakes,” the reporter asked her as she made her way through the terminal at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

Mrs. Clinton ignored the question, saying nothing as she stared straight ahead and kept walking alongside her Secret Service and police escorts, according to the newspaper.

But her campaign chairman, John Podesta, issued a statement Wednesday evening saying that the 2016 time frame for the committee’s completing its work “is the most compelling evidence yet that their investigation is solely about playing politics in the 2016 presidential campaign.”

Indeed, questions about her role in the Benghazi attack and aftermath are expected to dog her throughout the campaign, and her testimony before Congress would only sharpen the nation’s focus on her answers.

“Delaying Secretary Clinton’s testimony yet again, and calling for multiple appearances by the secretary, validates the concern many of us expressed at the outset, that the committee’s true purpose was to affect the presidential race,” said Rep. Adam B. Schiff, California Democrat and a member of the committee.

But Mr. Gowdy has said the prospect of Mrs. Clinton’s candidacy will not be a factor in the committee’s work and that Mrs. Clinton has only herself to blame for the email issue.

“I didn’t tell her to get a personal server. I didn’t tell her to hire her attorney to go through these 60,000 records, and Lord knows I didn’t tell her to delete 30,000 of them,” he said last month on “Fox News Sunday.”

~~~~~~~~~~

And here’s an ABC News update on April 23, 2015:

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., said he wants Clinton to testify the week of May 18 and again before June 18. The first hearing would focus on Clinton’s use of private emails, and the second on the September 2012 attacks that killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya.

“With her cooperation and that of the State Department and (Obama) administration, Secretary Clinton could be done with the Benghazi Committee before the Fourth of July,” Gowdy said in a statement.

It is necessary to call Clinton to appear twice “because the committee needs to ensure we have a complete and responsive record and all the facts before we then substantively question her on the Benghazi terrorist attacks,” Gowdy said.

Gowdy’s action comes a day after the GOP-led panel signaled its final report could slip to next year, just months before the presidential election. Clinton is widely considered the front-runner for the Democratic nomination for president.

Gowdy spokesman Jamal Ware said on Wednesday that Gowdy wants to complete the panel’s work by the end of the year, but said factors including witness availability, compliance with document requests and security clearances “could continue to impact the timing of the inquiry’s conclusion.”

A lawyer for Clinton said she is prepared to answer questions publicly regarding the Benghazi attacks and her email use as soon as possible.

“There is no reason to delay her appearance or to have her testify in a private interview,” lawyer David Kendall said Wednesday in a letter to Gowdy.

Clinton has twice testified before Congress on the Benghazi matter, telling lawmakers in 2013 that she takes responsibility for missteps by the State Department in the months leading up to the assault. But Clinton insisted that requests for more security at the diplomatic mission in Benghazi didn’t reach her desk, and reminded lawmakers that they have a responsibility to fund security-related budget requests.

Gowdy’s letter includes more than 100 questions he and other lawmakers may pose to Clinton about her email use, including why she considered using a private server and what was done to vet the companies or individuals who set up the server.

~~~~~~~~~~

This Gowdy/Kendall Mexican standoff is gonna get dicey. Kendall thinks that he can use the typical Clinton 3D defense technique (deny, delay, and defame) and get Gowdy to fold. I don’t think it’s going to work. Gowdy, even without Hillary’s 30,000 deleted emails, can still prolong the investigation and dribble (leak) tasty tidbits of information leading up to Hillary’s coronation and pollute her campaign waters until she can’t operate the way she wants. Gowdy has said that he has much more information and access to witnesses than any of the previous investigations so I don’t believe that he’s shooting blanks. He apparently doesn’t have a smoking gun, but Hillary does have obvious powder burns on her claws.

Garnet92

Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Benghazi probe likely to extend into 2016 – Hillary’s not happy

  1. Kathy says:

    If Gowdy allows her first testimony to be public, she’ll never be back for the second time.

    Gowdy is dropping those tidbits about having more info than other committees had and I wonder if that’s a scare tactic, a bluff or if he really does have the info. Call me the doubting Thomas but this is taking so long I’m beginning to think it’s all smoke and Clinton will walk away again.

    Off topic slightly, but Boehner and the House could have subpoenaed her server, not that it would do any good, but making that move would have shown they were serious and working together.

    • BrianR says:

      Kathy, I think this is political dynamite against Clinton regardless of what she tries to say in the hearing.

      I’ve been saying ever since this stuff started a couple of years ago that it was going to time out so that the big guns were going to come to bear during the campaign season. And that’s a very good thing, because I can’t think of a single thing that Clinton can say that won’t look absolutely terrible for her.

      How’s she going to gloss over the email scandal, particularly now that such “right-wing conspiracy” members such as the NY Times and WaPo are digging into it rabidly? AND the Clinton Foundation “pay and play” stuff?

      This is probably the main reason Clinton wants to skip the private hearing and get into the public one as quickly as possible, in the hope that it will be over and done and “old news” by the time the main campaign starts next year.

      Unfortunately for her, I don’t think that’ll work. Once the hearing’s over, however it goes, the record will be established. The NY Times, WaPo and the rest aren’t going to drop this. They smell blood, and if it bleeds it leads. Her campaign opponents will beat her to death with the established record.

      I just love this…

      • Kathy says:

        You’re more optimistic than I am and I hope you’re right, but she’s glossed over that trail of dead bodies and ‘gates’ for how long? 30-40 years and she’s still rollin’.

        There’s still a lot of time between now and election time for this to get swept under the rug and be forgotten. The NYT and WaPo will move on to other bleeding headlines and the LIVs who want her as prez simply because she’s a Clinton and/or a woman don’t care what she’s done.

      • Garnet92 says:

        Me too Brian – and I think you’ve got the scenario pegged. Hillary is toast as far as the presidency goes, she just won’t admit it – yet. This thing is going to percolate for months now that the Foundation has become blood in the water for the legacy media. Once they got on the scent, she lost her defensive line and she’ll be scrambling for her political life for the rest of the game.

    • Garnet92 says:

      I tend to agree with your first statement Kathy, but there appears to be a battle looming between Gowdy and Kendall – it’ll be interesting. He has stated that he’s had access to more documents and more witnesses than any other investigation so I think that he’s just stating facts there, the unknown is whether that additional info amounts to anything. Again, you’re right, Tan John should have backed Gowdy up on the server subpoena, but instead, he acted true to form and did nothing.

  2. Uriel says:

    Whether she answers or not in Congress (agree Boehner is blowing liberal) Foz news special report tonight is set to raise some major issues.

    • Garnet92 says:

      Although I usually watch some of O’Reilly, Kelly, and Hannity in the evenings, I am looking forward to this evening’s exposé.

  3. Uriel says:

    Fox has already investigated and found questionable links on US uranium mines. Can’t wait to see what else they researched for accuracy!

  4. CW says:

    At the rate Hillary is going Benghazi is going to seem like a day in the park next to her other shenanigans.

    • Uriel says:

      We can omly pray her backers are getting nervous and considering withdrawing it sure would be great if liberals saw exactly how Demo’s have sold even them down the river of rapids. But being so loose between the ears some will probably Never get it.

      • Garnet92 says:

        Nah, we don’t want her to withdraw YET. Leaves too much time for her replacement to get up to speed. Better that she not drop out until Spring next year.

    • Garnet92 says:

      Couldn’t happen to a more deserving witch.

  5. Grouchy says:

    LESSON: Don’t EVER tease a bulldog with a juicy bone. One is liable to lose more than the bone, as well as the arm holding it.
    Hillary is a done goose, but doesn’t know it yet.

    • Uriel says:

      Might I suggest all their funds, personal and foundation, go on the U S debt. Charity starts at home you know.

    • Garnet92 says:

      Sssshhhh, don’t tell her … yet. Let’s let more and more evidence dribble out that will truly cook her goose before she finally gives up. I’d rather not see her replacement get fully into the race until after the first of the year (not likely, but I can hope).

      • Grouchy says:

        Roger that, Garnet. You don’t breathe a word, and I won’t tell a soul. Keep it secret twixt you and me and the Cinnamon Tree. 😀

  6. Hardnox says:

    Stick a fork in the Hildabeast, she’s done. When the water carriers of the left like the NYT and WaPo go against their own the all is lost. The donation spigot just got turned off.

    I can’t wait to listen to a Gowdy/Hildabeast exchange. I might use it as a loop for background music. 🙂