“Don’t You Want to See a Woman President of the United States?”

 

From Rebel Media

“Don’t you want to see a woman president of the United States?” That’s Hillary Clinton’s unofficial campaign slogan. She’s a woman — so vote for her. Or you’re sexist.

Miles McInnes, the liberal brother of The Rebel contributor Gavin McInnes, went to Times Square and asked random Americans if being a woman was reason enough to vote for her. You’ll be depressed by the answers he got! You can watch the whole hilarious, depressing video.

He thinks it’s enough that Hillary is a woman.

After all, “We’ve done black. Let’s do a woman next.”

See how people reacted to the idea that being female was Hillary’s most important qualification for president.

(Warning: viewer discretion advised. Mature Content.)

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Gender should not be a qualifier for POTUS! If it was any other woman willing to run for President, then she should stand on her merits  (Hillary doesn’t have any!) . It’s not what’s between her legs but what’s between her ears that counts!

Of course though…the PSPs will vote for the “White Angel of Death” cuz she’s a woman…just like they voted for a half black man cuz of his skin color!

If Hillary gets into the WH, she will fulfill Obama’s third term with a vengeance that we have not witnessed since Hitler and the Holocaust!

“Not this Woman for President!”

~Blessed B~

Tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to “Don’t You Want to See a Woman President of the United States?”

  1. Buck says:

    No matter. The genitalians will vote for her. And a very large percentage of the genitalians are women. Which illustrates the dubious benefit to the American Experience enactment of the Nineteenth Amendment.

    • Blessed B. says:

      I know a lot of women that vote the same as their husbands…. so lots of men will also be voting for her.

      Some women use their own brains and know about politics. Unfortunately…it’s not many of the young ones.

  2. Grouchy says:

    Sadly, Buck’s comment above is all too close to reality. THAT SAID, there are MANY women who are qualified and capable of handling the responsibilities of the Presidency. Michelle Bachmann, Carly Fiorina, and Sarah Palin, to name three off the top my head. And the way the men are eliminating themselves, It would not surprise me in the least, that possibly one of them could make the cut.

    • Blessed B. says:

      I’d like to see any of those three women run for office. Sarah could be a formidable foe for Hillary to come up against….

  3. Kathy says:

    As we’ve said many times, yes to a woman president, just not this woman. America needs a recovery, not a repeat.

    • Blessed B. says:

      Yep….. no to repeats! Hillary and Bill started this mess…they sure wouldn’t be cleaning it up now.

  4. CW says:

    We’ve come full circle – back to a sexist society – thanks to the Left.

    Political races, like justice, should be blind; but if someone were to propose a ‘blind’ race, it would be the leftists who would object. Race and gender is about all they’ve got.

  5. carolinmd says:

    It was scary to hear so many mindlessly answer yes to a woman president and yes to Hillary as properly filling that position. Just another exercise in proving you can’t fix stupid… America loses again!

  6. Garnet92 says:

    I agree with carolinmd. Anyone who deems a candidate to be qualified simply because the candidate is a woman would explode if anyone suggested that the president must be a man. Ideally, the candidate’s gender or race or religion shouldn’t matter, but it does – thanks to political correctness. It’s a little too soon yet, but look for the gay lobby to push for an openly gay person to be elected next, followed not much later by a muslim (sic). At the rate we’re moving, we could look for a Golden Retriever to be nominated before the end of the century. Or maybe since most political types are lawyers, the next dog would be a Shit Sue?