Net Neutrality is Soros Funded

By Michele Hickford at Allen West:

George_Soros_47th_Munich_Security_Conference_2011_crop

You may not be aware the FCC passed new regulations on the Internet the end of last month. You probably have no idea what those regulations are. And that’s the way the FCC commissioner wanted it.

Under the innocuous-sounding “net neutrality,” the liberal majority, 5-person commission quietly passed sweeping regulations of the Internet designed to turn it into a government-regulated commodity.

Only today was the 400-page document released publicly, and now we know why it had to be kept secret. The real agenda becomes clear when you understand who was pushing so hard for the regulations.

Free Press, an activist group heavily funded by George Soros was instrumental in pushing the FCC to regulate the Internet, and in fact is cited 46 times in the document regarding its arguments supporting more regulation.

But there’s nothing really “free” about the real intentions of Free Press.

As the Daily Caller reports, “one of Free Press’ co-founders, Robert McChesney, a communications professor at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, has not been shy about his desire to see the Internet regulated heavily.”

“But Internet regulation appears to be only part of McChesney’s more radical agenda of completely revamping how the media operate in the U.S.”

“In the end, there is no real answer but to remove brick by brick the capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist principles,” McChesney wrote in a 2009 essay.”

So what is the true design of these regulations? As we reported previously, there appears to be a concerted effort by both the FCC and the FEC to eventually control content.

Phil Kerpen, president of the free-market group American Commitment, wrote an open letter to McChesney after the regulation was passed saying, “The unthinkable has become thinkable, and the free-market Internet – one of freedom’s greatest triumphs – is set to be reduced to a public utility, subject to pervasive economic regulation and, in turn, to content control.”

We are truly living in an Orwellian society where Newspeak is being forced upon us. Net NEUTRALITY? There is nothing neutral about government control.

Enjoy this website while you can, folks.

~~~~~~~~~

Well, there goes much of our first amendment right to free speech – how long until O abolishes the 22nd amendment next? I suppose that will depend on when Soros tells him it’s time.

You can click here to view the complete document, but just reading the contents list, which shows it be 583+pages long, will tell you all you need to know. The Constitutional considerations don’t even start until page 543, whereas the rules begin on page 14.

The amazing thing about net neutrality is that the FCC, much like the heavy hand of the EPA, did all this without Congress. They may as well go home because O doesn’t need them to do what’s on his agenda.

~Kathy

Tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Net Neutrality is Soros Funded

  1. Clyde says:

    If we had a Congress with BALLS, this shit would simply NOT happen. Those lackeys are too afraid of what the media who HATES them might say about them. Whenever Soros is involved, just figure FREEDOM is what HE is trying to crush.

    • Kathy says:

      Exactly, Clyde. We just let 5 people, 3 of them dems change free speech like never before without a peep from Congress.

  2. CW says:

    “Net Neutrality is Soros Funded”

    That’s no surprise. The Left’s quest for absolute power and control can’t be achieved in an atmosphere of free expression and unregulated information exchange.

    • Kathy says:

      True CW, they have to use underhanded, back-door and many times illegal moves to get what they want. I have to wonder what’s next, because they’re not done yet.

  3. Uriel says:

    The first move of communism is to educate the young, the second control all media, the third is chaos to control and increase fear, the fourth is place power in the hands of a ruling elite. Democrats have nearly always had communistic tendencies preferring government over state and leaning toward making all dependent upon government subsidies.

    O and Soros are thick as thieves and following the Communist Manifesto nearly chapter by chapter. Eventually if not halted, I sincerely doubt we will see anything but a sham election in 2016.
    O Should have never been reelected. If we looked closely at election results and funding, he would have been ousted then.

    However every day that passes he is sneaking more of these lawless actions in through his appointed positions in Every one of his executive divisions. He is pushing for internal strife so he Can bring in Russian and UN troops to assume totalitarian control. That boots-on-the-ground Fema agreement with Putin is still in force.

    As Kathy said, he has plays in motion from his first term until now that we may never unwind if not stopped. At least a few Democrats are waking up and getting nervous enough to speak against him as well as a few mainstream media.

    • Kathy says:

      Like you, I’ve been watching the communist agenda progress over the years, and even more rapidly in the past few years. Think about all the chaos we’ve had where one scandal or issue comes so quickly on the heels of the one before it.

      We followed the 2012 elections very closely and did quite a few posts on the massive amounts of voter fraud that got him back in for the second term. Had it not been for that, their planned would been thwarted, at least temporarily. The evidence of fraud was overwhelming, but nobody pursued it and Romney walked away without so much as a fuss.

      Control of the internet is control of people and communication, just one more of the steps in the plan.

  4. vonMesser says:

    “In the end, there is no real answer but to remove brick by brick the capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist principles” – so says one of the architects of the so-called Net Neutrality. So they’re starting here with silencing the conservative opposition by licensing blogsites and calling political blogs “in-kind donations to campaigns (but not calling their accredited “news” sites donations.)

  5. myfoxmystere says:

    Last month, I mocked Net Neutrality by calling it Net Neutering, If you go to my blog mystere’s moonbat slayer club, you’ll see how I mocked it. I’m not surprised Gorged Soreass is behind the net neutering. Will someone chop Soreass’s financial nuts and neuter his empire, please?

  6. myfoxmystere says:

    By the way, if you go to my blog and look at the photos, most of them already had captions before I found and used them.

  7. upaces88 says:

    Soros has International Warrants out on him. Why can’t anyone find him to slam him in a dark hole?!