After Netanyahu’s Speech, What’s Next?

From Breitbart:


Following his stirring address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will return home, having made his point about the dangers of the Iran deal currently on the table. The question is: what’s next for Congress?

President Barack Obama has vowed to veto any new sanctions–and may have sown enough division in his party to prevent an override. Yet there is another bill in the works that, after Tuesday, Obama may find he cannot refuse.

That bill is S. 615, the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015, introduced by Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) and sporting a bipartisan group of cosponsors. The bill would require that any deal with Iran be approved by Congress. The Constitution provides that foreign treaties be approved by a two-thirds vote in the Senate, but President Obama has insisted that he can sign a nuclear agreement with Iran through his executive authority–which is legally dubious and strategically unsound.

Last week, Obama said he would veto the Corker bill. And the pro-Iran lobby opposes it (while AIPAC supports it). The left-wing Democrats who boycotted Netanyahu’s speech–as well as those who remained, grudgingly, within the chamber–might find a basis for opposing new sanctions on the argument that they could torpedo the negotiations. But they would struggle to find a justification for giving Obama unilateral power over foreign agreements, against the Constitution itself.

Netanyahu did more than rally supporters of Israel in Congress. He made an unanswerable case against the deal that President Obama is pushing–one that would allow Iran to become a nuclear power within ten years. It was such a solid argument that Obama himself struggled to respond. He would struggle even more to override a bill that would insist that Congress have review of the final agreement. And after Netanyahu’s historic speech, it is clear that many will want a say.


Why would anyone think for a moment that O might approve this bill requiring input from Congress, when he has already stated that he thinks he has the authority to sign a nuclear agreement? He’s proven that court decisions don’t even slow him down, and he’s never let Congress stop him from doing anything.

Congress failed on Keystone, DHS funding, amnesty, so to think that they will be successful in stopping O’s Iran deal is ludicrous. They’ll argue about it and fight amongst themselves, then cave to O just like they always do.

If Bibi’s speech did anything, it’s made O a more determined man to have his own way. His actions will now reflect even more of that petulant attitude of  ‘Ha! I’ll show you!’ seen in spoiled brats.

Struggle?? O doesn’t struggle finding justification for anything – he bulldozes ahead with his plan and the chance to override another bill is just another victory for him.

He will get this deal – he’s been too hell-bent for too long to let Congress get in his way now.


Tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to After Netanyahu’s Speech, What’s Next?

  1. CW says:

    Well if Obama’s lie is that the Constitution gives him the authority to make the deal then I think it’s fair to assume he will use the same reasoning to ignore any law that tries to interfere with his lie.

    I appreciate that republicans feel compelled to try and do something to stop Obama, but anyone with a brain can see this nation has a serious problem when we are attempting to deal with a lawless administration by enacting more laws.

    I think that in addition to potentially having his plans and schemes impeded one reason for Obama’s strange anger over the Netanyahu speech was that it put the spotlight on the actions of his administration. The Left hates to be open to scrutiny and questioning the way a vampire fears sunlight. Obama all but sprouted fangs before our eyes when responding to Netanyahu’s speech. Dare we hope that this might make some of his followers say, “Hmmm………….”? I don’t think it’s completely impossible.

    • Kathy says:

      Great point, CW. Netanyahu pointed out the flaws in negotiating with Iran, something the Rs couldn’t or wouldn’t do. He made it apparent to everyone listening, but judging from the verbal attacks on him, it seems O’s followers have dug their heels in deeper rather than get the message.

      Even if that bill were to become law, O would just ignore it like he does the rest of them.

  2. Hardnox says:

    What’s next? War, that’s what.

    We can all bet that someone will start it.

  3. Grouchy says:

    The days of Biblical Prophesy are making themselves known.
    I find it hard to imagine how two so diametrically opposed ideologies can coexist in peace on one planet, and especially with the communication capability we enjoy now.
    What we are seeing, in Bibi and Obama, is the complete distinction between the LIGHT and the Darkness of human behaviour.

    Frankly, I am astounded in the simplicity of the chaos.