Timing Is Everything, Especially With THIS Bunch

My earlier post today spoke to the Regime telling it’s minions NOT to talk about “temperature”, but focus instead on CO2 emissions when trying to sell the notion of man-made climate change.

And OUT OF THE BLUE, here comes THIS report. Is it coincidence? With THIS bunch of liars, frauds, and little Himmlers, NOTHING is coincidence. From Anthony Watts at wattsupwiththat.com

Almost 30 years after Hansen’s 1988 “alarm” on global warming, a claim of confirmation on CO2 forcing

From the “this ought to shut up the “Skydragon slayers” department. Despite sophomoric claims that I’m a “denier”, I’ve never disputed that CO2 has a role in warming via retardation of IR transfer from the surface to the top of the atmosphere. What is really the issue related to AGW claims are the posited/modeled but not observed feedbacks and the logarithmic (not linear) saturation curve response of CO2. Along those lines, eyeballing the graph presented from the north slope of Alaska, it appears there might be a bit of a slowdown or “pause” in the rate of forcing from about 2007 onward. Hopefully, LBL will release the data for independent analysis.

CO2-forcing-barrow-ak

First direct observation of carbon dioxide’s increasing greenhouse effect at the Earth’s surface

Berkeley Lab researchers link rising CO2 levels from fossil fuels to an upward trend in radiative forcing at two locations

Scientists have observed an increase in carbon dioxide’s greenhouse effect at the Earth’s surface for the first time. The researchers, led by scientists from the US Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab), measured atmospheric carbon dioxide’s increasing capacity to absorb thermal radiation emitted from the Earth’s surface over an eleven-year period at two locations in North America. They attributed this upward trend to rising CO2 levels from fossil fuel emissions.

The influence of atmospheric CO2 on the balance between incoming energy from the Sun and outgoing heat from the Earth (also called the planet’s energy balance) is well established. But this effect has not been experimentally confirmed outside the laboratory until now. The research is reported Wednesday, Feb. 25, in the advance online publication of the journal Nature.

The results agree with theoretical predictions of the greenhouse effect due to human activity. The research also provides further confirmation that the calculations used in today’s climate models are on track when it comes to representing the impact of CO2.

The scientists measured atmospheric carbon dioxide’s contribution to radiative forcing at two sites, one in Oklahoma and one on the North Slope of Alaska, from 2000 to the end of 2010. Radiative forcing is a measure of how much the planet’s energy balance is perturbed by atmospheric changes. Positive radiative forcing occurs when the Earth absorbs more energy from solar radiation than it emits as thermal radiation back to space. It can be measured at the Earth’s surface or high in the atmosphere. In this research, the scientists focused on the surface.

The scientists used  spectroscopic instruments operated by the Department of Energy’s Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility. This research site is on the North Slope of Alaska near the town of Barrow. They also collected data from a site in Oklahoma. (Credit: Jonathan Gero)

They found that CO2 was responsible for a significant uptick in radiative forcing at both locations, about two-tenths of a Watt per square meter per decade. They linked this trend to the 22 parts-per-million increase in atmospheric CO2 between 2000 and 2010. Much of this CO2 is from the burning of fossil fuels, according to a modeling system that tracks CO2 sources around the world.

“We see, for the first time in the field, the amplification of the greenhouse effect because there’s more CO2 in the atmosphere to absorb what the Earth emits in response to incoming solar radiation,” says Daniel Feldman, a scientist in Berkeley Lab’s Earth Sciences Division and lead author of the Nature paper.

“Numerous studies show rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations, but our study provides the critical link between those concentrations and the addition of energy to the system, or the greenhouse effect,” Feldman adds.

He conducted the research with fellow Berkeley Lab scientists Bill Collins and Margaret Torn, as well as Jonathan Gero of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Timothy Shippert of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and Eli Mlawer of Atmospheric and Environmental Research.

The scientists used incredibly precise spectroscopic instruments operated by the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility, a DOE Office of Science User Facility. These instruments, located at ARM research sites in Oklahoma and Alaska, measure thermal infrared energy that travels down through the atmosphere to the surface. They can detect the unique spectral signature of infrared energy from CO2.

Other instruments at the two locations detect the unique signatures of phenomena that can also emit infrared energy, such as clouds and water vapor. The combination of these measurements enabled the scientists to isolate the signals attributed solely to CO2.

“We measured radiation in the form of infrared energy. Then we controlled for other factors that would impact our measurements, such as a weather system moving through the area,” says Feldman.

The result is two time-series from two very different locations. Each series spans from 2000 to the end of 2010, and includes 3300 measurements from Alaska and 8300 measurements from Oklahoma obtained on a near-daily basis.

Both series showed the same trend: atmospheric CO2 emitted an increasing amount of infrared energy, to the tune of 0.2 Watts per square meter per decade. This increase is about ten percent of the trend from all sources of infrared energy such as clouds and water vapor.

Based on an analysis of data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s CarbonTracker system, the scientists linked this upswing in CO2 -attributed radiative forcing to fossil fuel emissions and fires.

The measurements also enabled the scientists to detect, for the first time, the influence of photosynthesis on the balance of energy at the surface. They found that CO2 -attributed radiative forcing dipped in the spring as flourishing photosynthetic activity pulled more of the greenhouse gas from the air.

~

Given WHO funded this study, and WHO actually conducted this study, and WHERE, namely over OIL FIELDS, there can be NO other conclusion than the one the Regime will be trotting out over the near future that it is CO2 pollution that is “destroying the planet”, as they attempt to put even MORE onerous restrictions and taxes on everything we do, use, eat, whatever.

You take this post, with the information in my earlier post today, I think it is crystal clear, like the expanding polar ice packs, what the Regime is up to, so clear, in fact, even Helen Keller and Little Stevie Wonder can see it.

However, the loony left, the Gorons, Hollyweirders, and the U-frigging-N IPCC will be clapping and bobbing their heads for the fish tossed from the Regime, THEY won’t even know how BADLY they’ve been lied to as long as it sounds good. There is no doubt in my mind ANY data from this obviously slanted study is seriously flawed.

Where are the causation panels ? Causation data ? Bueller ?  Anyone?.

This Regime continues to be a CRUEL joke, played upon the Earth. And it IS NOT funny.

~

CLYDE. Denier, and, in the eyes of the Regime, a (GASP) terrorist. Just because I search for TRUTH. Sheesh.

 

Tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Timing Is Everything, Especially With THIS Bunch

  1. Uriel says:

    There is not an accountant or scientist worth his salt that can not skew or “refine” data to prove any point they wish. It is partly why I need proof where I can determine not someone with his/her own agenda.

  2. I.R. Wayright says:

    I’ve got a new name to be collectively applied to any idiot that spends more time worrying about something they can’t ever control than about what is really important.
    ~Haarpy Chemtrailer~

  3. Kathy says:

    More of that same old Chicken Little ‘the sky is falling’ and the boy who cried wolf. People are getting tired of hearing these false alarms… well, sane people, that is.

    • Clyde says:

      I find it amazing, Kathy, that LESS than 3 % of people say “climate change” is a BIG issue with them, but the leftists keep hammering away daily at it. I think they are just trying to “wear us down”. Got a news flash lefties : S’AIN’T HAPPENIN’.