You’re Racist if You Oppose Loretta Lynch

From Liberty Eagle:

IMG_3478.JPG

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said he will oppose Loretta Lynch’s confirmation for U.S. attorney general because she supports civil forfeitures, but the Congressional Black Caucus knows his real motive — he’s racist.

“Senator Paul is using the issue of civil forfeitures to block a well-qualified federal prosecutor from heading the Department of Justice,” CBC Chairman G.K. Butterfield, D-N.C., said in a press release. “Senator Paul also has the audacity to suggest that Loretta Lynch should have more concern for people living in poverty.

Butterfield added: “The Congressional Black Caucus recognizes Senator Paul’s unfounded argument as nothing but an excuse to keep an African-American legal scholar from holding this high position, …

Civil forfeiture turns justice on its head,” Paul said. “Instead of being innocent until proven guilty, you are guilty until proven innocent. The government takes your cash — $1,000, $100, $500, whatever it is. This program predominantly has targeted black individuals, poor individuals, Hispanic individuals. And when Sen. [Mike] Lee asked her about it in the committee, she said, ‘Oh, no, as long as there is a valid court order.’”

Remember — police can seize that property without charges even being filed. They often do so when there is no evidence of a crime. They have been known to take the homes of parents whose children were alleged to have sold drugs without their knowledge. Current AG Eric Holder even took steps earlier this year to limit the use of the practice by requiring evidence of a crime before assets could be seized.

Lynch has used the practice in her office to rake in more than $113 million in civil actions between 2011 and 2013.

~~~~~~~~~

Is it possible a person more vile than Holder exists? Apparently so. He at least took the steps to justify the use of civil forfeiture, whereas Lynch utilizes it to the max and likely will continue if confirmed as our next AG.

Of course, Rand Paul is racist – that’s why he spends his spare time performing free eye surgeries on non-white indigents in Central American countries. So typical of the CBC and the Al Sharptons of the US to pull the race card simply because they have no valid argument.

It was either use the race card on him or accuse him of waging war on women – they can never accept that someone might actually be standing on principal. It’s unrecognizable to them because they have none.

~Kathy

Tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to You’re Racist if You Oppose Loretta Lynch

  1. CW says:

    If Paul was acting on racial biases, who could blame him? Eric Holder and Barack Obama have set pretty poor examples for what we can expect.

  2. captbogus2 says:

    “The Congressional Black Caucus recognizes Senator Paul’s unfounded argument as nothing but an excuse to keep an African-American legal scholar from holding this high position, …”
    Uh… Mr. Butterfield, we’ve had an ‘African-American’ legal scholar holding this high position for the last 6 years and we have seen how the racial divide, misapplication of law complete incompetence, meddling in local affairs and refusal to carry out the assigned duties of the office have resulted.

  3. Terry says:

    Judging by the performance of the blacks in this regime to date, I’d say a race card is well justified.

    • Kathy says:

      Justified, maybe, but it wasn’t played by Rand Paul – it was played by the CBC, following in form their pos president and AG.

  4. Garnet92 says:

    Has anyone else noticed that once a black is appointed or elected to a position, that position then becomes a black position and apparently the blacks come to believe that the position belongs to them? It’s not unlike the Kennedys “owning” that senate seat in Massachusetts.

    I think that it’s time for US to be playing the RACE CARD. Who is more racist than the Congressional BLACK Caucus? Who is more racist that Barack Odumbass or Eric Holder or Al Sharpton, etc. THEY are the racist and they’re the ones who have set back race relations at least a decade since they’ve been in power.

    • upaces88 says:

      You have an excellent point!!!
      “ism” … the last letters of race-ISM…means — “Anti” —–
      They fits for all of us too.
      THEY ARE RACIST TOWARDS WHITE PEOPLE.

      • captbogus2 says:

        Simple.
        They hate White People because they are not White
        Why else would Sharpton slick back his kinky hair with 2 lbs of pomade?
        Why else would Michael Jackson bleach his skin and change his nose?

        • upaces88 says:

          My daughter knew a Black NY Poet. He wrote a very small poetry book (it is hard to find because there are so many books with the same title: “On the Road To Damascus by Gerren Lyles (or Liles?) (my copy was stolen…by a Black person).
          In the small poetry book he explains:

          “Blacks hate themselves for being black and Project that hate onto the White People.”

  5. Hardnox says:

    The whole racist meme is beyond old. I’m sick of it. Garnet makes a good point too. Now every AG will need to be black as if that is that provides some extra insight into the Constitution and our laws. Geez…

    Lynch has plainly stated that she will abide by the Constitution but will not enforce unfair laws just like Holder. That’s an immediate disqualifier right there. Next…