Guess What ELSE Islam Is Hypocritical About ?

In any muslim area around the world, you will see various stores selling “halal” meats. While not overly familiar with halal, it seems to me it’s a LOT like KOSHER.

But, leave it to the “adherents of the religion of peace” to enjoy a bit of torture BEFORE slaughtering meat animals. A.B. Sanderson from Breitbart London.com has the story.

WARNING : GRAPHIC CONTENT. IF YOU ARE SQUEAMISH,OR EASILY OFFENDED, LEAVE NOW.

 

Secret Filming Reveals Horrific Treatment Of Animals At Halal Abattoir: DEFRA Claims no Religious Link

Hidden cameras, planted by animal welfare charity Animal Aid, showed horrific treatment of sheep in a slaughterhouse in North Yorkshire.

Employees, at the Bowood Abattoir near Thirsk were filmed sawing at animals’ throats with seemingly blunt knives. Staff, at least one of which wore a Muslim kufi skullcap, were caught on camera stamping on sheep and kicking them in the head, as they attempted to transport them onto a conveyor belt, the Telegraph reports.

If THIS is what “halal” is all about, FORGET it. I’ll take MY chances with KOSHER.

I wonder if the ” religion of piece” considers THIS “halal” as well ?

 

British law prohibits the slaughtering of animals unless they have been stunned, but there are legal exemptions for religious food producers; those animals being slaughtered for halal and kosher consumption. While religious leaders have always claimed that animals slaughtered using their methods are killed humanely, the footage from t is the latest in a line of cases where halal food has resulted from cruelty.

Veterinary and scientific bodies have claimed for decades that animals not stunned prior to slaughter, feel considerable pain. John Blackwell, the President of the British Veterinary Association, said: “Slaughter without stunning unnecessarily compromises animal welfare at the time of death and as such we call for an end to its practice.”

“The Animal Aid film is truly shocking. Whether in a stun or non-stun abattoir these abuses would warrant sanctions under the current welfare legislation.”

An online petition has gathered over 100,000 signatures calling for an end to non-stunned slaughter.It has gained the backing of celebrities including Ricky Gervais, actress Sadie Frost and Queen guitarist Brian May.

A 2003 report from the Farm Animal Welfare Council called for the end of the religious exemption and again, in 2009. Owing to scientific proof, animal slaughter in both Denmark and New Zealand requires stunning.

The RSPCA have responded angrily to the footage, telling Breitbart London: “This footage sounds absolutely shocking. The public has a right to expect that all farmed animals have as painless and humane an end to their lives as possible.”

A DEFRA spokesman has ruled out any change to the current exemption for religious animal slaughter and refused to concede any link between bad practice at slaughterhouses and religious practise. DEFRA claimed that it was simply a case of poor standards in individual slaughterhouses.

NFU chief livestock adviser John Royle said: “While the moral or religious questions on slaughter are not a matter for the NFU we do expect that whatever slaughter method is used, it should place animal welfare as a priority and employ sound scientific principles to its method.

“We expect the high levels of welfare on British farms to continue once livestock leaves the farms to go to slaughter. We are proud that the Red Tractor farm assurance standard requires that all animals are stunned before slaughter.

The Halal Food Authority, condemned the practices in the video as unrepresentative of halal slaughtering and against Islamic law. “Any imam [Islamic leader] who looks at this video would be disturbed. Every activity is a contravention of animal welfare standards – the operatives are poorly behaved and trained, the knives are not sterilised and do not appear sharp. These are very special circumstances and have nothing to do with stunning or non-stunning.”

In a worrying trend, according to the Food Standards Agency, the number of animals killed without stunning rose 60% to 2.4 million last year.

There have been a rise in the number of people calling for labelling on non-stunned food so consumers may have a choice to opt out of purchasing food killed in an inhumane way.

And an Australian housewife has launched a campaign for labelling, claiming that the method of production ‘funds extremism’.

Ms Smith uses her website to encourage consumers to lobby both companies and government with their wishes, suggesting the text:

“I do not wish to support any brand that pays an Islamic religious tax to have their product halal certified. Less than 2 percent of this population is Muslim and I do not want to fund special religious rituals or political campaigns to increase the presence of Sharia Law in Australia.

“Please respect consumers and give them/us the necessary information so we can make our own choices.”

~

Since Islam treats it’s HUMAN captives worse than animals, WHY would we expect them to treat their slaughter animals any different ?

By this article, we can CLEARLY see the DEFRA, or Department Of Environment, Food, and Rural Activities, is trying it’s damnest to deflect the criticsm of the 7th century barbarians.

It is GREAT to see the Brit, and Australian push back against ANY muslim barbarity, be it human, OR animal. SADLY, too many of England’s celebutards are more concerned with the way the animals are treated, as opposed to how these savages treat their HUMAN captives.

~

CLYDE. Muslim barbarity is NOT just for humans, we see.

Tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Guess What ELSE Islam Is Hypocritical About ?

  1. Hardnox says:

    Thanks for posting this.

    The barbarity is systemic in the culture. I witnessed a halal slaughter event ONCE, albeit purely by happenstance. That was enough to last me a lifetime. The bastards really enjoy killing and the ritual leading up to it. They seem to be fascinated with the whole thing. Sick, sick, sick.

    The problem also is that they teach it to their kids.

    • Clyde says:

      I knew this would get your hackles up. As ones who love what animals can, and do for us every day, their slaughter for our further benefit SHOULD be somewhat dignified. NOTHING about the Islamic world can be classified as dignified. Thanks, Boss.

  2. Kathy says:

    Further proof they are insane. Who in their right mind would want meat butchered in this manner, when ours is so much more sanitary in comparison? Anybody that sells this stuff deserves to be shut down by the health department.

    • Clyde says:

      It looked to me like any situation muslims are in. Make it as brutal and painful as possible. Got to be “Mohammed Approved” you know. Thanks, Kathy.

    • upaces88 says:

      Kathy they are “criminally insane.
      In Austrilia, Several years ago, there were many Muslims who knew they just “were not right in the head” and asked for help. I don’t know what they outcome was.

      • upaces88 says:

        This came from a Lockheed pilot who has had 3 assignments to Saudi Arabia.
        During the pilot transition program with the KV-107 and C-130 with Lockheed, we found that most Saudi pilot trainees had very limited night vision, even on the brightest of moon lit nights. Their training retention rate was minimal including maintenance personnel.
        Some had dim memories and had to be constantly reminded of things that were told to them the day before. Needless to say, an American, British or any other western instructor gets burned out pretty quick. It actually took Muslim C-130 pilots years before they could fly in the dark safely and then would be reluctant to leave the lights of a city. Ask any Marine, Air Force or Army guy who’s been trying to train Iraqis, and especially Afghans. They will say, “Yep, dumber than homemade dodo”.
        Islam is not only a religion, it’s a way of life all the way around. Yet another set of revealing facts about Muslim beliefs and traditions and ways of life.
        1400 years of inbreeding.
        I found this to be interesting. Didn’t know whether to believe it or not. To research I went to Wikipedia, “Cousin Marriage”, and far down in the article “Genetics”, it seems there is a lot of truth here.
        A huge Muslim problem: Inbreeding
        Nikolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first-cousins.
        This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world.
        This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world, since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.
        The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health.
        According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.
        The numbers are equally devastating in other important Muslim countries: 67% in Saudi Arabia, 64% in Jordan, and Kuwait, 63% in Sudan, 60% in Iraq, and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.
        According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.
        The risks of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher.
        Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of still births and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.
        Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages. (Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)
        In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.
        Sennels says that “the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world.” He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.
        In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.
        Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. “A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies.”
        Only nine Muslims have ever won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the “Peace Prize.” According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research measured by articles per million inhabitants.
        In Denmark, Sennels’ native country, Muslim children are grossly over represented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background. Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of school children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.
        Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of patients in Denmark’s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background.
        The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, “One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.”
        Sennels concludes: There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims’ religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. This has produced overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.
        Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims. Simple Judeo-Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous religion. These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish public polices dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building of mosques in the U.S.

        • Liz entrekin says:

          Great information Upace. Shame thery haven’t already regressed further yet to nonexistent. it doesn’t explain though why presumably more intelligent nonMuslim genetic mutants are actually joining them.

        • Clyde says:

          Damn good post, upaces. Watch out, Hardnox is ALWAYS looking for “good help”.

  3. Liz entrekin says:

    Absolutely, Kathy. Recently there was an article about Walmart and halal in which they have caved and will begin selling to muslems. The accompanying video was horrific and that was just 1animal. Talk about Satan worship at its finest. My family now is refusing to buy much especially meat from this company.

  4. Crawfish says:

    Remember also that all “halal” meat has been blessed to Satan’s service before the throat is slit.
    “Allah is the Greatest of Deceivers”, says the quran. This is admission that allah is Satan.

  5. ustwo3 says:

    I agree totally with Ms Smith and whilst it has nothing to do with the cruelty inflicted by these people, I found out today that Cadbury is making their chocolate bars smaller and not lowering their prices…is this to cover the cost of the halal certification?

    • Clyde says:

      First off, ustwo3, welcome to Hardnox and Friends, and thanks for taking the time to read, and comment. As for Cadbury, my guess would be YES, it IS to cover the jizya tax for being “halal”. Here in the States, ev erything is going the SAME way. Smaller package, higher costs. Seems like leftist governments everywhere screw up everything. Stop by anytime, good to hear from you.