Has Environmentalism Met Jihad ?

It damn sure looks like it, according to this article. Greenpeace cannot run THEIR own damn scam, so NOW, one of it’s “adherents” is threatening ISIS type tactics to “convert” we “deniers”.

Bring it on, moonbat m-fer’s. There are WAY more of us, WELL-ARMED than there are of YOU cretins. This sickening article comes from Donna Rachel Edmunds at Breitbart.com


Greenpeace Activist Calls for Climate Change ‘Deniers’ to be Beheaded

 by Donna Rachel Edmunds  25 Jan 2015

If “joking” about beheadings is funny to THESE assholes, THAT banner is speaking TRUTH.

A climate change advocate, believed to be a Greenpeace activist and Guardian contributor, has called for the beheading of so-called “climate change deniers”, arguing the world would be a better place without them. The comments are merely the latest in a long history of warmists advocating the killing of people who question global warming dogma.

On January 21st, in it’s ‘Climate Consensus – the 97%’ section, the Guardian published an article entitled “Matt Ridley wants to gamble the Earth’s future because he won’t learn from the past”, which was illustrated with a fake, but nonetheless rather gruesome image of a severed head.

So THIS is what Gary Evans, Greenpeacer, believes should happen BECAUSE one disagrees with HIM ? Gary, old asshole, it will be YOU before ME, pal. Stupid sonofabitch. Hope you leftists are PROUD of your little moonbat.


The article drew hundreds of comments, including one from ‘Bluecloud’ on the day the article was posted, reading “Should that not be Ridley’s severed head in the photo?”

Further down he added “We would actually solve a great deal of the world’s problems by chopping off everyone’s heads.

“Why are you deniers so touchy? Mere calls for a beheading evolve [sic] such a strong response in you people.

“Ask yourself a simple question: Would the world be a better place without Matt Ridley?

“Need I answer that question?”

The comment has since been removed by moderators, allowing ‘Bluecloud’ to attempt to deny that he had called for violence. On Sunday morning he commented “Oh dear, it didn’t take much for the denial industry to start claiming environmentalists are out to chop off people’s heads.

“It’s clear that when they have no argument to make, they stoop to misquoting deleted posts”

Others also tried to deflect blame, with commentor ‘ianhassall’ writing “Bluecloud’s moderated comment is causing quite a stir, isn’t it.

“If warmists can’t get their point across with the settled science I’ve got no doubt they’d resort to the sort of violence he’s suggesting.”

To which Bluecloud replied: “And what violence would that be? Making false claims is easy in the absence of evidence.”

Unfortunately for Bluecloud, the evidence is easy to come by on Twitter. Climateologist Richard Tol has tweeted a screenshot of his original comment in full:

Embedded image permalink

Furthermore, the Bishop Hill blog is reporting that others commenting on the Guardian article revealed Bluecloud to be Gary Evans, a Greenpeace funded “Sustainability Consultant”, according to his Linked In profile, who has written for the Guardian in the past.

The comment fingering Evans was apparently deleted by the Guardian moderators far in advance of Evan’s comment being deleted.

Bluecloud’s comment comes a week after a Professor Emeritus of Physics at Princeton University called climate change activism a “jihad against atmospheric carbon” in a new paper for the Global Policy Warming Foundation.

However, this is not the first time that global warming advocates have threatened violence against those who question the theory of anthropogenic global warming. In 2010 Greenpeace’s Gene Hasmi wrote: “Pressuring politicians on climate change is not working. We saw that in Copenhagen. Three months later, we also know why. Which is why the global climate movement now must do course-correction. We need to shift targets and go after the real termites that hollowed out and imploded Copenhagen.

“Emerging battle-bruised from the disaster zone of Copenhagen, but ever-hopeful, a rider on horseback brought news of darkness and light: “The politicians have failed. Now it’s up to us. We must break the law to make the laws we need: laws that are supposed to protect society, and protect our future. Until our laws do that, screw being climate lobbyists. Screw being climate activists. It’s not working. We need an army of climate outlaws.”

“The proper channels have failed. It’s time for mass civil disobedience to cut off the financial oxygen from denial and skepticism.

“If you’re one of those who have spent their lives undermining progressive climate legislation, bankrolling junk science, fueling spurious debates around false solutions, and cattle-prodding democratically-elected governments into submission, then hear this:

“We know who you are. We know where you live. We know where you work.

“And we be many, but you be few.”

2010 also saw the release of the 10:10 Campaign’s supposedly comedic ‘No Pressure’ video, penned by Richard Curtis, in which children and office workers who don’t want to do their bit to prevent climate change are blown up by hitting a big red button.


So, now if you are a climate skeptic, a “denier”, one Greenpeace idiot, jokingly or not, comes out and spews those people should be beheaded?

If this does not prove the total derangement of the leftist, anti-capitalist global warming movement, especially those “wonderful saviors of the planet” Greenpeace bastards, nothing will.

Too bad we couldn’t concoct a scheme whereby it was shown Greenpeace was insulting the Prophet. Then, assholes like Gary Evans could see WHY someone MAY be a bit “touchy” about beheadings. Then, Evans and his ilk could see what “jihad” REALLY is.

As HIS stupid head with ZERO brain is rolling away from his body. It would serve him right.


CLYDE. You stupid goddamn “rainbow warriors” want to be “climate outlaws” ? Bring it, asshat. Just bring a BIG lunch. We will supply YOUR coffins.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Has Environmentalism Met Jihad ?

  1. Kathy says:

    These jackasses are overusing a very serious word in trying to dramatize their issue. Much like the use of the word ‘war’, as Cap pointed out in a recent comment. Nowadays there’s a war on everything, so the significance is diminished.

    But like you Clyde, I’m sick of the whole bunch of them. If they’re serious, just bring it on.

  2. Two thoughts came to mind after reading this. This person needs major prayer and what an ass.

    Like Kathy said “But like you Clyde, I’m sick of the whole bunch of them. If they’re serious, just bring it on.” I agree. I am tired of being threatened when my only crime is disagreeing with them.

    • Clyde says:

      You are FAR more generous than I, lafayette. Prayers are a waste of God’s time with pukes like Gary Evans. Now, if you are praying for God to hit him in the ass with a lightning bolt, I could be cool with that. Thanks for checking in.

  3. Garnet92 says:

    People who think like Bluecloud are like an automobile with a bad plug wire – it’s not hitting on all cylinders – it’s missing, and he and others like him are missing too; they are missing rational thought.

    And ironically, they say that something is wrong with US!

    And what the hell is a “sustainability consultant?” That is no doubt a euphemism for Greenpeace activist. It’s like Global Warming. When that meme was thoroughly discredited, they had to change the name. As the public recognized Greenpeace as nothing more than environmental anarchists, they now change the name to “sustainability consultant” – each time people start realizing what buttholes they really are, they have to change their names.

    • Clyde says:

      This moron would shit himself to death BEFORE Jihadi John could slice his foolish frigging head off. This is the type of asshole one just wants to KICK on sight. Thanks, Garnet.

  4. CW says:

    As shocking as it is to see the beheading photo, that visual underscores the mindset we’re dealing with. I have no doubt that the hardcore leftists see nothing wrong with suggesting that people who stand in the way of their agenda should be beheaded. My only question is this: what took them so long?

    • Clyde says:

      They’ve been doing it, CW. We just don’t see it, because the leftist media squashes ANY story portraying leftists as they TRULY are. Thanks, good comment.

  5. Hardnox says:

    I’m with CW. Good to see some honesty coming from the left. This only strengthens our resolve that they are pure evil.

    The irony is that the left couldn’t survive without us. We on the other hand could do very well without the left.