15 More Benghazi Related Murders

From Freedom Outpost:

Does it Matter Now Hillary?

benghazi-liars-420x215

Wednesday the Senate finally made a statement about Benghazi. A bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee has found that the State Department could have likely prevented the death of  four Americans in Benghazi if they would not have ignored the intelligence reports and pleas for assistance from our diplomatic mission.  The findings are that increased security was needed. USA Today reports:

Congressional Democrats for the first time joined the GOP to  condemn the State Department for refusing security measures they say could have prevented the deaths of the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans in Benghazi.

The report, worked on for months and released Wednesday by a  bipartisan Senate intelligence committee, also says 15 people in Libya who have tried to help the FBI investigate the murders have been killed.

15 persons in Libya who were attempting to cooperate with the FBI investigation are now dead. I have to wonder how intelligent our Intelligence Committee really is, because alternative media seems to be far beyond what these Senators are finding. Here’s another thought. Maybe they aren’t that stupid, but they think we are.

Not only did we need more security, the security we hired was grounds for  treason. How many Americans know that our State Department hired a group called the February 17th Martyr’s Brigade to defend the diplomatic mission?  How many know that the February 17th Martyr’s Brigade is al Qaeda? Why on earth would you hire the enemy to defend against itself? This is just one of many Benghazi facts that are not being reported in the American press.

How many convenient deaths does that make now for Hillary Clinton?

If you want to see a list of 46 you can find them here. Who could forget the mysterious  Vince Foster suicide or James McDougal’s convenient heart attack? There are 44 more names on that list. If you want to dig really deep inside the deaths of many of these people you can visit a site called Arkancide.

Who could forget the bombshell admission of Larry Nichols?

The answer to that is probably almost everyone because very few even know the admission happened:

“Whenever I got an F2 call, that meant go and kill. State police are not  trained to kill in … the late ’70s, early ’80s. There were no SWAT  teams…. I had an F2 call, that meant go in and kill a guy. I didn’t give a shit…. When it [the order to kill] came from the president [Reagan],  it was for God and country. When it came from Clinton, hell, I didn’t give a damn. I just go kill somebody, cut his nuts off.”

Why is it that no one takes this interview seriously? Why has none of the mainstream media reported it? If it is untrue then expose Larry Nichols as a liar and let’s move on. But the media acts like the interview never happened. Larry Nichols and the Clintons should be investigated and likely stand trial. Nichols made these comments on a national radio show and no one seems to care.

So, as we head closer and closer to 2016, and an almost guaranteed Hillary Clinton victory, the American people still don’t seem to care. Someday Americans need to learn to think for themselves. There are bad democrats and bad republicans. 95% of them are worthless no matter what party they choose to affiliate with. But so many people would rather vote for a person surrounded by “convenient deaths” than to cross party lines or simply make a wise decision  in the primaries. If the election were held today, which thankfully it was not,  Hillary would have won in a landslide.

So today we add 15 “collateral damage” deaths to the Benghazi list and there is still no evidence that can directly implicate Hillary Clinton, at least in the eyes of our lawmakers.

How many more people will have to conveniently die before Americans start seeing what is truly happening? If 2016 goes the way it looks, the answer to that could be a substantial number.

Pray you never have anything that might implicate a Clinton, because if you do you might just kill yourself or be hit by a falling tree. I don’t know why it happens. It just does.

Could these 15 people have been killed by people not at all related to Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama? Yes, obviously that is a possibility. But it sure does seem convenient once again.

When and where does it end America?

benghazi

~~~~~~~~~

At the end of the day, she was responsible for ensuring the safety of all Americans serving in our diplomatic facilities. Her failure to do so clearly ‘made a difference’ in the lives of the four murdered Americans and their families, 30 additional survivors, and now 15 more deaths, all related to Benghazi. At some point this wretched woman must be held accountable and simply cannot be our next president.

~Kathy

Tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to 15 More Benghazi Related Murders

  1. Clyde says:

    So the Senate agreed. BFD. With that bastard Reid running it, NOTHING will come of it. Only ONE cure for the cancer of wretched politicians we are afflicted with. Rope, Tree, Shaky Stool.

    • Kathy says:

      It’s been 15+ months and we still don’t have all the pieces. The stalling and the mountains of lies are what pegs the meter.

  2. I dread the day when the mass media reports that Hillary won the election in 2016, we’ll be headed for far darker times.

  3. In grief and sorrow, one can only ask, “Dear God, where does it end???”,,,

    I have no idea. This even is beyond comprehension, and it seems so damn few care.

    Great post, Kathy,,, there’s only one thing wrong. That is, that it is capable of being posted in the first place~!

    • Kathy says:

      True, Grouchy. We’ve said many times the fact that it’s even a news item is bad enough, and for it to be so mired in cover up makes it worse.

  4. Hardnox says:

    No surprise that the Senate gave the Hildabeast a pass on this with Reid in charge. So much evidence is being ignored or glossed over. What about the Morsi/MB tie to the attack? Some of our legislators know the score but are unable or unwilling to talk about it.

    • Kathy says:

      Diane Frankenstein had much to do with it as well, and according to General Vallely’s site, Hillary is only mentioned one time. What???

      They’re not trying to get to the bottom of this; they’re trying to put it behind them so it’s not a ‘bump in the road’ when 2016 rolls around. The most disgusting part is that they want to win so badly, they’re willing to accept, even approve of her as a candidate.

  5. CW says:

    The USA Today link you provided had this quote by Rep. Jason Chaffetz:

    “The bottom line is Hillary Clinton wanted the appearance of normalization” in Libya. Security was not driving these decisions. Politics was.”

    That’s the real smoking gun here, IMO. Why? Because politics will ALWAYS be the driving force for the decisions made by ALL leftwing politicians, and that’s because they are compelled by motivations that are inconsistent with the duties they’re supposed to be responsible for. So not only should Hillary not be our next president, no leftist should ever be our president.

    Also, you asked why no one is taking the Larry Nichols interview seriously. After listening to part of his interview I can only tell you why I don’t take him seriously. He doesn’t sound credible. He sounds like a nut. Why would he openly confess to murder and risk going to prison? That makes no sense. And who are all these people he’s supposedly killed and why are their families and friends silent? If the Clintons are so good at taking out their enemies, why don’t they just have this guy taken out? According to Nichols he killed for Ronald Reagan too. He killed for Reagan because he’s a patriot but he killed for the Clintons for the money (that’s some patriot). I couldn’t make it through the entire interview but both he and the radio host are hard to take seriously.

    • Kathy says:

      I’d certainly agree they are driven by politics, otherwise known as power and greed. So driven are they that corruption has no limits.

      Personally, I would have left out the part about Nichols because it’s a bit off topic, but the author at Freedom Outpost included it, so I left it. It’s a reminder of the Clinton history and might interest some of our readers, although I seriously question his credibility.

  6. Garnet92 says:

    Another good one, Kathy. Maybe I’m a loner on this, but I’m not ready to concede the 2016 election to Hillary. One, she’s not black, and two, she’s going to play hell getting completely away from Benghazi, and three, she is just not personable. If we have even a passable candidate, we can (based on today’s optics) beat her.

    • Hardnox says:

      I’m with you Garnet. She is a vile creature by any standard. Let’s not discount the lemmings that will want to make history again because she is a woman (I use that term loosely).

      IF, the GOP is smart… Big IF, they will hang Benghazi around her neck.