This is the second article in a series on 2012 Voter Fraud and a companion piece to Garnet’s excellent post, titled “How the RNC Has Screwed Us All”, which describes the RNC’s inability to protest voter fraud committed by the Democrats.
Today’s focus is on Ohio. None of this information is new but it deserves revisiting as it demonstrates how bad the voter fraud really is despite the left’s claim that there isn’t any.
Below are a number of articles that highlight the obvious fraud that took place in Ohio:
Excerpt from Fox News:
Fox News has received several complaints from voters who say they voted on touch-screen voting machines — only when they tried to select Mitt Romney, the machine indicated they had chosen President Obama. The voters in question realized the error and were able to cast ballots for their actual choice.
“I don’t know if it happened to anybody else or not, but this is the first time in all the years that we voted that this has ever happened to me,” said Marion, Ohio, voter Joan Stevens.
Stevens said that when she voted, it took her three tries before the machine accepted her choice to vote for Romney.
Excerpt for The American Dream:
Barack Obama received more than 99% of the vote in more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio on election day. In fact, there were a substantial number of precincts where Mitt Romney got exactly zero votes.
So how in the world did this happen? Third world dictators don’t even get 99% of the vote. Overall, Mitt Romney received 30.12% of the vote in Cuyahoga County. There were even a bunch of precincts in Cuyahoga County that Romney actually won. But everyone certainly expected that Cuyahoga County would be Obama territory. And in most of the precincts that is exactly what we saw – large numbers of votes for both candidates but a definite edge for Obama.
However, there are more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County where the voting results can only be described as truly bizarre. Yes, we always knew that urban areas would lean very heavily toward Obama, but are we actually expected to believe that Obama got over 99% of the votes in those areas?
In more than 50 different precincts, Romney received 2 votes or less. Considering how important the swing state of Ohio was to the national election, one would think that such improbable results would get the attention of somebody out there. Could we be looking at evidence of election fraud hidden in plain sight?
The article continues:
Unfortunately, we may never know the truth about these election results. We are just told that we can trust the voting machines and that we can trust whatever results they end up spitting out at us.
Look, I don’t know what the truth is, but where there is smoke there is usually fire. Voters reported tens of thousands of voting problems on election day, and it will be an absolute disgrace if those complaints are brushed under the rug now that the election is over.
Setting aside who won or who lost, the legitimacy of our elections if of the utmost importance. If we cannot even trust the ballot box, what do we have left?
In Ohio, two election judges were caught allowing unregistered voters to cast ballots.
Many Ohio voters that showed up at the polls on election day were surprised when they were informed that they had already voted.
In fact, there were reports all over the nation of people being unable to vote because records showed that they had already voted.
Democrats would like us to believe that there are no significant voter irregularities despite evidence to the contrary. Of course they do, they have become masters at voter fraud.
All of this ties right back to the 1982 Consent Decree where the RNC is unable to challenge voter fraud. This is not just a republican problem. This fraud undermines everyone’s basic right of voting.
See related Articles on ‘Nox & Friends
PS. Stay tuned for Part III (Colorado) which Mrs. AL is presently researching.