The War Of Ideologies

When generals go into battle, the very first thing they do is to define to their best ability the capabilities of the enemy. When businesses run into problems, the first step they take is to define the problem and all pertinent details of the challenges they face.

The intercultural conflict the nations of the earth face at this moment in Earth’s history is much the same.

Daniel Greenfield has an excellent essay defining and outlining the parameters of our current challenges.

The Desert of Islamization 

Posted by Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog
Saturday, October 26, 2013

Wars are fought with steel and of words. To fight a thing, we have to understand what we are fighting and why. A blindness in words can kill as effectively as blindness on the battlefield.

Words shape our world. In war, they define the nature of the conflict. That definition can be
misleading. Often it’s expedient.

The real reasons for the last world war had very little to do with democracy. The current war does involve terrorism, but like fascism, it’s incidental to the bigger picture. The United States would not have gone to war to ensure open elections in Germany. It hasn’t been dragged into the dysfunctional politics and conflicts of the Muslim world because of terrorism.

** ** ** ** **

Islam, like Nazism, makes a lot of utopian problems and pays the check for them through conquest. Like Communism, we’re up against a rigid ideology, brainwashed fanatics, utopian fantasies and ruthless tactics. And we can only win by being honest about that.

We are not yet dealing with armies. This is still an ideological conflict. Terrorism is just the tip of a much more dangerous iceberg. It’s the explosion of violence by the most impatient and least judicious of our enemies.

What we are dealing with is Islamization. Islamization is the imposition of ideological norms in increasing severity. Like Nazification, it transforms a society by remaking it in its own image from the largest to the smallest of details.

** ** ** ** **

Islam is Islamist in that it “Islamizes” what it comes into contact with. Islamists are not a separate movement. They are Muslims following a legacy of intolerance by practicing Islamization.

Religion can exist on a personal level and a public level. Religion on a personal level can be accommodated in a public space so long as it does not change the nature of that public space. For example, a group of people can pray in a school cafeteria. Secularists may object, but their objection is groundless unless the praying people then announce that no one is allowed to do anything in the cafeteria except pray… and only in their approved way.

That is Islamization in a nutshell. It begins with accommodation and ends with theocracy.

When a Muslim imposes his religious identity on someone else, he is engaging in Islamization. That is the difference between Mark, the Mormon taxi driver who refuses to drink alcohol and Mohammed, the Muslim taxi driver who refuses to drive a passenger carrying alcohol.

Mark is practicing his religion in a public space. Mohammed is imposing his religion in a public space. Mark’s religion can be accommodated because his choices extend to his own body. Mohammed’s religion cannot be accommodated because it hijacks any public space that he exercises influence over by attempting to Islamize it. Islamization causes conflict, terrorism and war.

Every devout Muslim is an “Islamist”. Islam is not a personal religion. It is a religion of the public space. A “moderate” Muslim would have to reject Islam as a religion of the public space, as theocracy, and that secularism would be a rejection of Islam.

Nothing in Islam exists apart from anything else. While liberals view culture and religion as a buffet that they can pick and choose from, it is a single integrated system. If you accept one part, you must accept the whole. Once you accept any aspect of Islam, you must accept its legal system and once you accept that, you must accept its governance and once you accept that, you lose your rights.

** ** ** ** **

Islam has been imported under the guise of multiculturalism, but it does not recognize the idea that there can be room for multiple religions and ways of doing things in the same space. While Muslims exploit multiculturalism, the outcome of injecting Islam into a system is an Islamic space in which alternatives are either eliminated or marginalized. Islam is not a multi anything. It is a single uni.

Islam does not integrate. It disintegrates. It’s hazardous to any culture or political system that comes into contact with it. It colonizes public spaces and pushes out anything that is not it. Or as the arsonists of the Library of Alexandria said, “If it is in the Koran, it is redundant and ought to be burned. If it disagrees with the Koran, then it especially ought to be burned.”

What goes for the Library of Alexandria, also goes for all knowledge, ideas, culture and thought. Islamization measures them all against the Koran and finds them either redundant or incompatible. Like a virus, Islam destroys anything that isn’t it so it never has to compete against anything, because, as its societies demonstrate, it is not capable of competing.

Islam reproduces incestuously. inbreeding its ideology until it has copied it over itself so many times that there is no room for anything else. Wahhabism or anything that is associated with “extremism” is simply Islam copied over itself even more times. It’s not extremism, it’s simply undiluted. It is what happens when you take out as much as possible of everything that isn’t Islam.

That is the objective of Islamization. It copies itself over until Hijabs become Burkas, until everyone is illiterate and killing each other over minor points of doctrine so their chief gang leader can become Emir. When it runs out of non-Islamic things to copy over and destroy, it copies over its own form, introducing errors, schisms, conflicts and religious wars.

The Islamist, like the virus, attempts to destroy what is non-Islamic to Islamize it. His tactics may be small, but his goals are big. And his success leads to a wasteland in which there is only the endless nothingness of Islam, a religion built on the endless conquests of Islamization, and which in the absence of external conflict must turn on itself.

Read the full article HERE.


~ ~ oOo ~ ~


This article defines the Rules Of Engagement, as well as the Terms Of Conflict. Islam is not just a “religious ideology” or belief system. It is an insidious encroachment on the basic freedoms of humanity in every way, shape, manner and form. This applies culturally, theologically and personally.

Essentially, and bottom line, Islam demands the death of civilization as it has progressed to this point over the past many thousands of years. If Islam wins, it sounds the death knell of freedom and liberty of humanity.

This is no time for cowardice, at any level: Cultural, Judicial, Personal, nor Legislative. It is past time to take off the blinders and the “Rose Colored Glasses”, and see clearly the challenges we face.

This article has been slightly edited for reader convenience. I STRONGLY suggest going to the original article and reading it in full, to get the full import of what Mr. Greenfield is telling us.

~ ~ Grouchy ~ ~

Tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to The War Of Ideologies

  1. Clyde says:

    World-class post,Grouchy. Take a bow. Greenfield lays it out as it REALLY is, NOT the way liberals believe it to be.

  2. Buck says:

    Same thing I’ve been saying only he said it better.

    • Buck, You and me both. This is a war that will be won and lost on many fronts, not the least of which will be militarily. Bullets will not eliminate ideas. The proof of that pudding is in the resurgence of the ideas of communism and Nazism.
      Always has the Freedom of the individual been under attack. And that freedom has won all too rarely.

  3. Kathy says:

    Good stuff, Grouchy. It wouldn’t be near as scary if our government weren’t embracing it like a normal religion. There’s nothing normal about it.

  4. Buck says:

    Right on, Kathy. In their rush to embrace diversity they have identified themselves with such dangerous ideologues as the islamists and such morons as the perverts…

  5. garnet92 says:

    I think the danger here is that Islam is being “sold” to us as just another major religion, just another expression of diversity (diversity being deemed good). And for the most part, most non-aware citizens think that we should welcome Muslims just as we welcome other religions. By the time that LIVs realize who/what they represent, women will be wearing black burqas, kept ignorant, and not allowed to drive.

    Maybe by then the hyphenated last name N.O.W. members will wake up.

  6. Hardnox says:

    They have had 1400 years to hone their skills and tactics. the West for the large part has been totally asleep the last 50 years. The enemy is within the perimeter I’ve said it a thousand times… Cowboys vs. muslims is the only answer. This time for all the marbles.

  7. Terry says:

    Very sobering article. Good post GF.

  8. Mrs AL says:

    > “Words shape our world.”

    > “Islam does not integrate. It disintegrates.”

    And the islamists in our country are winning the war of words.

    Superb post, Grouchy! This is important for folks to read and munge upon.

  9. western guy says:

    Where is Ghengis now that we need him…he made a lasting ‘peace’ with islam…

  10. myfoxmystere says:

    Daniel Greenfield knows the full extent of what horrors lie ahead, for he is a practicing Jew. They know Islam calls the USA “The Big Satan” and Israel “the Little Satan” and that Islam is hell bent on genocide. I have had the honor of meeting the First Israeli Army General who fought the first war Israel engaged in after it returned to being a nation in 1948: the late General Shimon Erem. General Erem had realized from the start that all the victories Israel had gone through are the result of Our Good Lord Jehovah. General Erem told me and my radio colleagues about the miracles God gave him during the 6 day war in 1967 and how Israel should have lost, had it not been for God’s protection and blessings. General Erem encouraged us to keep fighting against Islamization, warning us of the dangers we will face when the Muslims engage in a full on Jihad. Daniel Greenfield confirms everything that General Erem and the Israeli Army has fought against. General Erem’s organization Israeli Christian Nexus continues to educate the followers about what we are facing in the near future. Daniel Greenfield and many others remind me about how Gideon tore down the Baal Idols and the fury the Baal worshippers expressed when their fake god Baal got “insulted” by an infidel. Let’s keep tearing down Islam’s Baal god Allah, and see how Baal answers their delusional victims.

    • Thank You, MyFox,,, I was not in any manner aware of the actions in the 6 Day War. The meeting you had with General Erem was indeed fortuitous~!
      Thomas Jefferson, (?), Winston Churchill, and now thousands of others are attempting to awaken the population of the world to these inherent dangers. Yet, the scales over the eyes are so heavy and thick that jack-hammers cannot touch them.
      The price of ignorant stupidity will be visited upon the Earth for generations to come, unless the Book of Revelations is fulfilled in its entirety~!