WHO Says Global Warming Is Bad?

Well, other than the AGW idiots. There ARE some POSITIVE aspects to this that we NEVER hear about from the limpdick media.

So, you CAN find it HERE. From The Daily Caller.com.

Study: Global warming could yield $11.6 trillion in increased crop  production.

12:50 AM  10/19/2013   by    Michael Bastasch

Higher crop yields, thereby LOWERING the cost of feeding the world. Now WHY wouldn’t liberals like THAT?


THIS is more like what the leftists would like to see.

Could global  warming be a boon  to farmers? A recent study found that rising carbon dioxide  concentrations bestow an additional $11.6 trillion in benefits from crop  production between now and 2050.

The Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change found that while  many studies focus on the costs of rising  carbon emissions, few studies focused on whether or not more carbon in the  atmosphere could be beneficial to society.

In fact, the Obama administration recently raised its social-cost-of-carbon estimate from $21 per metric ton to $35 per metric ton  to the ire of global warming skeptics and Republicans. The estimate reflects how  much each ton of carbon emitted costs the U.S. economy.

The number was disputed by economists who argue that there is “little  science” behind the estimate and it is politically malleable.

“The ‘social cost of carbon’  is a very malleable concept that can be inflated or deflated by turning certain  wheels,” said Institute for Energy Research senior fellow Robert Murphy.

While the Obama administration has touted the costs of carbon emissions,  going so far as to impose new regulations on coal-fired power  plants, they have  neglected to mention any areas where global warming could benefit society.

One such area is food production, according to the center.

The center’s study focused on  benefits to global food production because higher carbon dioxide levels in the  atmosphere have been shown to stimulate plant productivity and growth, as well  as increasing plant’s water conserving and stress-alleviating abilities.

“The results indicate that the annual total monetary value of this  benefit grew from about $20 billion in 1961 to over $160 billion by 2011,  amounting to a total sum of $3.5 trillion over the 50-year period 1961-2011,”  reads the study. “Projecting the monetary value of this positive externality  forward in time reveals it will likely bestow an additional $11.6 trillion on  crop production between now and 2050.”

“It is clear from the material presented in this report that the modern rise  in the air’s CO2  content is providing a tremendous economic benefit to global  crop production,” the study adds.

Recently the United Nations released its latest global climate  assessment, claiming “95 percent certainty” that human activities drove global  warming and that global temperatures would “likely” rise 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit  over pre-industrial temperatures by 2100.

Burning fossil fuels has helped increase the global concentration of carbon  dioxide to nearly 400 parts per million today, and current trends indicate that  the carbon concentration could increase to about 700 parts per million by 2100,  according to the center.

“And as the CO2 concentration of the air continues to rise in the future,  this positive externality of enhanced crop production will benefit society in  the years, decades, and even centuries to come,” according to the  study.

The center goes on to add that such benefits to crop production should be  factored into the Obama administration’s social cost of carbon  estimates.

“The very real positive externality of inadvertent atmospheric CO2 enrichment  must be considered in all studies examining the [social cost of carbon]; and its  observationally-deduced effects must be given premier weighting over the  speculative negative externalities presumed to occur in computer model  projections of global warming,” the study concluded. “Until that time, little if  any weight should be placed on current [social cost of carbon]  calculations.”


Does  ANY leftist believe THIS report? Doubtful.

As long as the ignorant, and the media (sorry about the redundancy) keep pounding away at the lie, the truth has a MUCH harder time of seeing daylight.

As long as charlatans such as Gore, and his ilk, stand to profit off this scam, the truth will be buried by those of same ilk.

Now, to answer the question under the photo. IF the despots of the world, such as our current resident, can keep the masses HUNGRY, it is MUCH easier to CONTROL them.

I simply do NOT believe the world’s leftists have ANY clue as to what lengths a hungry mom will go to feed her kids. Or, a hungry man to satisfy their appetites. It’s going to SUCK to be THEM. It also sucks to even THINK so-called “leaders” would use food as a tool for control. Sadly, we have already witnessed this in MANY third-world shitholes.

If WE do not get THIS nation back into adult hands, WE could see the same type of despotism rise here as well.

Keep the powder, AND your SEEDS dry.








Tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to WHO Says Global Warming Is Bad?

  1. Terry says:

    I expect The Goracle will be investing heavily in farmland and gaseous cattle now
    Very secretively of course.

  2. Buck says:

    I don’t believe it, either.

  3. Kathy says:

    They’ll have to deny this, because they can’t keep fighting global warming if it’s a good thing.

  4. Buck says:

    I am not a GW freak but I will deny it. Summer before last and the summer before that I had zero produce from my garden because of the heat. Two fruit bearing trees died.
    This last summer I had a bountiful crop thanks to the more moderate (ugh I hate that word) weather…

    • Clyde says:

      High heat, coupled with the drought, I’m not surprised. Not like Oklahoma doesn’t get that from time to time. Not much will grow when those two factors hit the same time, for sure.

  5. Hardnox says:

    GW allowed the Vikings to settle Greenland for 300 years. They grew crops there. They left because of the Mini ice age.

    The lemmings have been so programmed to believe that Co2 is bad that they will not believe anything else.

    Food is power. The Left is all about power.