Is Obama Creating a Martial-law-ready Military?

From American Thinker by Selwyn Duke

What kind of leader wants a military more loyal to himself than to the rule of law?

And why?

These are two questions to ponder when considering the strange happenings in the armed forces since Barack Obama took office.

Let’s start with a hypothetical. Let’s say you were a hard-left-wing commander in chief who wanted the military firmly in your corner. You’d certainly note that our armed forces have been a bastion of conservatism and Christian faith, and you’d know that its members generally weren’t very fond of you. So how would you go about changing this?

Some years ago I met a very young, all-American looking white fellow who had just exited the military. His reason was that he hadn’t been advanced the way he believed he should have been, and he wasn’t going to remain in the armed forces if it provided no future. Now, one interpretation here is that he was a millennial with an inflated opinion of himself (he didn’t strike me that way, though). Yet there is another interpretation.

The Obama administration has given affirmative action in the military a dose of steroids, promoting minorities and women — and, I believe, homosexuals and lesbians — at the expense of white men. By the way, is this yet another reason why Obama wanted homosexuals to be able to serve openly? After all, you can’t target them for special treatment if you don’t know who they are.

But the point is this: if I were that hypothetical hard-left-wing leader, I’d know that one way to change the military’s political climate is the same way you do it in the nation at large.

Demographic manipulation.

White men generally vote Republican, white military men even more so, and white military men who are practicing Christians, well, that’s a recipe for a left-behind left. Minorities, women, atheists and the LGBT* crowd, however, are reliable liberal constituencies. So what would I do if I were that hard leftist?

I’d create a military climate friendly toward groups that are my constituencies and hostile toward those that aren’t.

And I’d do more than subordinate white men to other groups in the promotion process. I’d clamp down on Christian expression — which had often been robust in the military — and punish servicemen who transgressed against my separation-of-church-and-everything policy. I’d let the world know that as far as homosexuality goes, the armed services are open for monkey business. I’d also force military personnel to be politically correct not just about sexuality, but also Islam, so that they were confronted with the choice of saying things they don’t believe or career damage. After all, good people might rather leave the service than live a lie. And I’d issue instructional materials characterizing traditionalists as a threat, so that the low-information servicemen may believe it and the more savvy would feel further alienated.

The goal here is to create a situation in which traditionalists will be encouraged to leave the military or not enlist in the first place. Of course, this method can’t bleed out all the red-blooded, but it can shift the balance. It can ensure a few things:

• The number of leftist fellow travelers in the armed forces will be as great as possible.

• As many of the rest as possible will be apolitical, mind-numbed types who wouldn’t question unconstitutional orders.

• The remaining traditionalists would be outnumbered by the first two groups and in a don’t ask-don’t tell predicament. And having been denied promotions, they’d have little institutional power.

At the same time that I was transforming the body, I’d also have to gain control of the head. To this end I would look to replace as many generals as possible with those I believed would do my bidding. For once I owned the military head, body and soul, I could really dream that impossible dream.

Anyway, that’s what I would do were I that hypothetical hard-left-wing leader.

Incidentally, they’re all things Barack Obama has already done.

As for the generals, note that the two-star general who oversaw our arsenal of intercontinental missiles, Major General Michael Carey, was just fired, becoming “the latest in a string of recent high-profile firings of top U.S. generals,” as Reuters puts it. Talk-show-host Michael Savage discussed this on his Friday program and was very suspicious about the Air Force’s reluctance to provide a reason for canning the man who oversaw our nuclear weapons — the service only said that the general was terminated for undisclosed “personal misbehavior.” As for me, I’ll just repeat my opening questions:

What kind of leader wants a military more loyal to himself than to the rule of law?

And why?

Whatever your conclusions, there is of course a mundane explanation for all of this. Leftists truly believe in their insane diversity dogma and quite reflexively try to socially re-engineer whatever they can sink their claws into, be they universities, neighborhoods, businesses or even the entities charged with protecting their compassionate selves. And in this age of increasing corruption and decadence, it wouldn’t be surprising to find generals transgressing against military code. Yet given that Barack Obama is a shadowy figure with a penchant for hiding his past (college records, etc.); that he has had avowed communists in his administration (Van Jones, Anita Dunn); that he seemed to belong to Chicago’s socialist New Party in the 1990s; and that, according to former Occidental College acquaintance and ex-Marxist John Drew, Obama was a flat-out “Marxist Leninist” who believed in old-style communist revolution, well, one’s imagination can conjure up some interesting scenarios.

The only question is, is it at all possible that Obama’s imagination conjures up the same ones?

—oo—

Draw your own conclusions.

“If it walks like a duck…”

~ Hardnox

About Hardnox

Constitutional Conservative that Lefties love to hate.
Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Is Obama Creating a Martial-law-ready Military?

  1. Clyde says:

    You know full damn and well that is what the bastard is up to. Good post, albeit a piss-me-off moment.

  2. Mrs AL says:

    Thanx so much for posting this, Hardnox. It is very important. This is going to sound kind of goofey, but the first thing I thought of after reading this was that the Resident wants to have a Syrian-type military. (Told you it would sound goofey).

    • Hardnox says:

      Your comment is not goofy at all. Assad had purged his brass thus the defections because some knew they would be canned. Erdogan in Turkey has purged over 500 of his generals. This is typical in any dictatorship. A coup is always a concern.

      Look what happened in Egypt. Morsi was in the process of a purge. The generals moved quick to stem that tide. Now most have been reinstated.

  3. Buck says:

    1. Much as Stalin purged the Russian military prior to WWII.
    2. Anything, no matter how gross, offensive or terrible, that can be imagined by one person, will be done by another.

  4. Kathy says:

    Why would he do this at the risk of weakening the military against our enemies? Why does he want or need martial law when he’s already got the country in a choke hold?

    Somebody wants him to be the King of Amerika…forever.

  5. A Cadre of “Yes Men”,,, and none dare say a word, nor think a thought au contraire

  6. randy63ism says:

    It’s worse than that. 0bama is an out and out Marxist-Leninist-Muhammunist. In other words, an unrepentant islamunist with a penchant for mirrors, both for vanity and smoke. Some would question his love of mirrors, for how can a vampire love such a betraying device? But alas, the true narcissist could never be a vampire because his need for delusion-nourishing mirrors far outstrips the vampire’s need for entitlement-nourishing blood. Nay, 0bama is not the vampire, 0bama is Lord of the Vampires! The narcissist takes succor from his constituents, the mere vampire, who in turn, takes succor from our very lifeblood, our wallets, with which the dark Lord of the Vampires is all too eager to slake their thirst with. All the while Valerie “the Ferret” Jarrett, a true to form arch vampire, seductively whispers sweet communist dogma into his large, receptive, Neumannesque ears, feeding his already bloated, gluttonous, narcissistic head.

    We ain’t seen nothin’ yet. A brain fart from this freak will be our nation’s utter ruin.

    What a stink!

    • Perfect Summation, Randy. Maybe the towel around his head will keep the fart enclosed???

      • randy63ism says:

        We can only hope my friend. You know Grouchy, you just inspired me to tag 0bama with a new moniker, “the Stenchful One.” I mean he does stink, lol. Right?

    • Hardnox says:

      A stellar comment Randy.

      I didn’t know about the mirrors. Please elaborate.

      • randy63ism says:

        A vampire’s image doesn’t cast a reflection in a mirror, hence it is a method of detecting one. Since the vampire knows of this vulnerability, he/she tries to avoid them. The narcissist, on the other hand, loves mirrors because he/she is stuck on him/herself.

        It’s true! Lon Cheney told me this himself, or was it Bela Lugosi? 😉

        I don’t know, I’m so confused lately, Arrrrrrgg!!

  7. Buck says:

    Kathy: “Why would he do this at the risk of weakening the military against our enemies?”
    Because those whom we consider enemies he calls friends.

  8. vonmesser says:

    As a Marine is reported to have said:
    When I joined it was illegal to be queer
    Now it’s optional
    I’m getting out before it’s mandatory

  9. bullright says:

    Very good article, analysis. Always liked Duke. So true. Why not do for military what he does everywhere else? Makes perfect sense. Yesterday as he made that award I thought I heard Obama say and now I turn it over to “my military.” (must check transcript,,,if available)