Fire Up The ‘Dozers. (Just Put LARGE Condoms On Them)

In an absolutely INSANE press release from the idiots on Turtle Bay, it seems our “friends” at the U-frigging-N have decided the Chinese need “sensitivity” for AIDS.

What lunacy. From (where else) Yahoo News.com

 

UN agency urges China to drop HIV spa ban.

Can one FIND a condom BIG enough for THIS?

 

Damn sure wouldn’t want my ‘dozer getting diseases from THIS bunch.

                                        Beijing (AFP) – China plans to ban HIV-positive people from spas, hot springs and public bathhouses, provoking condemnation Monday from the United Nations’ AIDS agency and outrage from campaign groups.

The proposed Ministry of Commerce rule is the latest instance of enduring discrimination against HIV carriers in the world’s most populous country.

China bans those with the virus from becoming civil servants, and HIV-positive people face the possibility of losing their jobs if their employers discover their status, while some have sought hospital treatment only to be turned away.

The draft regulation posted online by China’s State Council, or cabinet, orders spas and similar establishments to prominently display signs prohibiting “people with sexually transmitted diseases, AIDS and infectious skin diseases”.

Hedia Belhadj, China country coordinator for UNAIDS, said Monday the organisation was concerned by the provision, and called for it to be removed.

She pointed out there is no risk of transmission of HIV in a spa or bathhouse setting.

“UNAIDS recommends that restrictions preventing people living with HIV from accessing bath houses, spas and other similar facilities be removed from the final draft of this policy,” Belhadj told AFP.

She urged that “any other policies preventing people living with HIV from accessing public or private services also be revised”.

UNAIDS estimates that there are 780,000 people living with HIV in China.

Chinese campaign groups blasted the proposed rule.

“The only value of this draft law is in discriminating against those with AIDS,” Yu Fangqiang, director of the Nanjing-based anti-discrimination NGO Justice for All, told AFP.

His organisation and five other domestic NGOs are seeking to collaborate on a response, he added.

“This law must be changed. All the HIV NGOs know this new rule, and they want to fight it,” Yu said.

China only lifted a long-standing ban on foreigners with HIV entering the country in 2010, although in recent years top officials have begun speaking more openly about HIV prevention and control.

The country has also made strides in expanding access to free antiretroviral drugs for HIV-positive people.

But discrimination against those with HIV/AIDS remains an issue at hospitals, workplaces and other establishments across the country.

In January a draft regulation in south China’s Guangdong province would have banned people with HIV and other sexually-transmitted diseases from becoming teachers. Officials dropped the provision in April after an outcry from rights groups.

Most attempts by HIV-positive people to sue over discrimination have failed.

But, in the first judgement of its kind, earlier this year a plaintiff who had been denied a teaching job after it was revealed that he was HIV-positive was awarded 45,000 yuan ($7,400) from a county education bureau in east China’s Jiangxi province, state media reported.

It marked a milestone that activists have cited as a cause for hope in future legal battles.

Campaign groups and international organisations say that widespread stigmatisation of those with HIV in China has complicated efforts to curb its spread.

Addressing the “stigmatisation and discrimination against people living with HIV is essential in the national response,” Belhadj said.

~

First off, it ISN’T ANY of the goddamned U-frigging-N’s business WHO allows WHO into their establishments. If a government is trying to CONTROL a disease that transmits via sexual activities, then it is THAT government’s RIGHT and DUTY to do so.

If the queers in China, or anyplace else for that matter,want their OWN bathhouses, then let THEM open their OWN establishments, let them “go at it”, and MAYBE wipe out a bunch of the faggots.

In my opinion, this smacks of NOTHING more than an attempt by UNAIDS (Jesus Christ, WHY do they have to acronymize EVERYTHING) to shake down the Chinese government, all in the name of “fairness”.

What the HELL is FAIR about allowing DISEASED people to intermingle with those who wish to remain DISEASE-FREE ? Especially THIS one. In a goddamned bathhouse or anyplace else ? NO risk of HIV transmission in a bathhouse?  And, since WHEN haven’t bathhouses, gay or not, NOT been an area for sexual activities? Either the idiot Yu Fangqiang  and the U-frigging-N idiotess Belhadj is naïve, or lying.

The U-frigging-N. Showing us YET AGAIN why Mohammad Atta hit the WRONG building in New York.

Tip O’ the tam-o-shanter to Hardnox.

~

Clyde

Tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Fire Up The ‘Dozers. (Just Put LARGE Condoms On Them)

  1. Buck says:

    I’d enter a comment but Clyde has already said it better than I could.

  2. “WHEN haven’t bathhouses, gay or not, NOT been an area for sexual activities?”
    That says the whole basis for the reasoning, indeed~!
    The U.N. is the bastardized execution of a grand idea. And like Obamacare, we need to defund it.

  3. Clyde says:

    I’m not so sure the U-frigging-N WAS such a great idea, GF. It has failed worse than it’s predecessor, the League Of Nations, IMHO.

    • You’re right, Clyde,,, But what it BECAME, is NOT what it was intended to BE.
      Take the best idea in the universe, and a screwed up execution renders it SNAFU FUBAR

  4. Hardnox says:

    This and a ton of other things is not the business of the UN. What a sovereign nation does or does not do is not the business of a world body that was chartered for the purpose to prevent wars.

    It is long past time that the original charter be re-instituted or simply abolish it the whole thing. I prefer the latter since it hasn’t served the charter well either.