Censorship: First Britain, Then The World

.
Censorship is the goal of all totalitarian ideologies. The world has become a much smaller place since the advent of the internet, and philosophies of all natures are or can be freely shared. Knowledge is no longer the provence of a chosen elite aristocracy, but it is rather shared world-wide.

That said, there is a “Law of Unintended (?) Consequences”. And Britain is pushing that Law to the limit. Below are examples of the latest efforts I have found in on-line internet censorship.

 

UK Prime Minister David Cameron: Stop the unnecessary censorship of “esoteric” websites and web forums!

 

Petition by Jaime Tanna London, United Kingdom

Please read this and sign the petition against unnecessary “blanket” web filters that look set to block esoteric websites and web forums here in the UK, according to information obtained by the Open Rights Group.

THE UK IS ABOUT TO BE CENSORED BEYOND WHAT IS BEING SPOKEN ABOUT OPENLY IN THE PRESS. YOU CAN HELP STOP THIS.

The Prime Minister recently announced the move to introduce legislation that will force ISPs to create default filters when people sign up for internet services. This is being touted as a move to stop pornographic and extremist material from getting through to end users, including vulnerable children.

Yet, what is extremely worrying, and not yet widely known, is that the Prime Minister’s internet filters will be about more than just hardcore pornography.

Open Rights Group, which campaigns for digital freedoms, has had the opportunity to speak to some of the Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that will be constructing Cameron’s content filters, discovering that a host of other categories will be on the block list, including “esoteric material” and “web forums”.

This should ring alarm bells for most of us! How can “esoteric material” and “web forums” be grouped with pornography and extremist sites?

These top-level filters will be most likely be linked to a list of keywords – made by the government, of course – and any websites that have any of these keywords will be blocked/banned.

According to Open Rights Group, this list will be created behind closed doors with NO appeal mechanism.

Websites that promote “esoteric practices” whether directly or indirectly, have already been blocked on pay-as-you-go Orange phones.

Users, including myself, have had access denied to alternative belief/spirituality websites whilst using wifi hotspots in public places.

Who will determine what the word “esoteric” means? This is the first question to ask ourselves.

Will websites that mention “spiritual healing” and “reiki” be blocked by default? Will websites that have “pagan” overtones – those which use words like “summer solstice” or “tarot” or “wiccan” – be blocked?

Would the category of eating “raw foods” (there is a big “raw foods” health movement in the USA, for example) be classed as cult-like or “esoteric” material, either now or in the future, and blocked?

These are valid concerns that should not be casually brushed aside. It is painfully obvious that the word “esoteric” is a broad catch-all term/category that is ripe for misuse by our government.

The second question to ask ourselves is why is the word “esoteric” such a problem?

Angela Pritchard, author and researcher into the universal nature of spirituality and consciousness, and co-author of two books on ancient sacred mysteries, says that,

“‘Esoteric material’ which implies all manner of spiritual knowledge and practice, has been lumped in with the worst of human behaviour in this filter—forming one of 9 categories, which includes pornography, violence, and suicide related websites.”

Whilst Angela agrees with the former Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre boss Jim Gamble, who told BBC Radio that it was important to ‘get to the root cause’ of illegal pornography, she points out that

“it is important to get to the root cause of why ‘esoteric material’ became part of this filter, who was responsible for adding it, what their religious or non-religious affiliations are, and why it has not been addressed publicly by David Cameron? This appears to have been done as a very shady back-door deal indeed between the UK government and large ISP companies.”

And even if you don’t care much for esoteric, spiritually-based websites, wouldn’t you be enormously frustrated if a genuine, helpful online forum that you wanted to visit was blocked, especially if that forum had key advice that could help save a life? Many web forums give key information on sexual health matters, abuse, addiction and so forth.

What if you unchecked the box to opt out of filtering defaults and still couldn’t get through to a legitimate site you wanted to visit? Would you be bothered to even follow up with your ISP, especially if you were held in a rather long phone queue? How frustrating!

As a business owner in East Dulwich, South East London, I had a taste of this draconian filtering mechanism two years ago. I went to my local Caffe Nero to have a coffee and catch up on some business administration.

Together with my wife, we run a holistic business which also mentions “Spiritual Healing” amongst other key services such as Reiki, Reflexology, Yoga and Indian Head Massage. I was stunned to find that I could not access my own website as it was blocked. The message on the screen told me it was classified under “Alternative Spirituality/Belief”, and access was denied through their web filtering system called “Blue Coat”.

I was frustrated, not only because I couldn’t access my own website, but because others were also being blocked from visiting a website which did not harm anyone. I eventually managed to resolve the issue but it took time and energy to do so.

Christos, from Greece, had a similar experience five years ago when he went with some friends to MacDonald’s in Camberwell, London in 2008. He says the following:

“We had our laptops with us. When we tried to visit one of the websites that at that time was offering free online courses…. we received the message ”alternative spirituality” and we weren’t able to access it. We were puzzled at the time and surprised. I had just arrived in London and such an attitude did not seem one of a developed country at all.”

Personally, I see nothing wrong with seeking to empower others through spirituality, and the ability to respect and honour all people everywhere. Do you?

Mindfulness and spirituality are big buzz words right now, and surely fall into the category of “estoteric”.

Wall Street Journal says that top companies are employing spirituality in their vision, so why does Cameron have a problem with it?

“Other companies in the mainstream using Mindfulness include Apple, AstraZeneca, Comcast, Deutsche Bank, Google, Heinz, Hughes, McKinsey, Nortel Networks, Proctor & Gamble, Raytheon, Texas Instruments, Unilever, and Yahoo. They cannot all be wrong, surely?” Wall Street Journal

We can all understand why the government, and parents all over the world, would want to block content that degrades both men and women, and causes hatred in any way – websites such as pornographic websites, or zealous religious bigotry, but to block content that seeks to uplift and inspire others, what kind of message is that giving? That does not make sense to me.

Public figure websites such as the Dalai Lama, Deepak Chopra, and Neale Donald Walsch would almost certainly fall into this category of “esoteric” and “alternative spirituality/belief.” The British Society of Dowsers and The London School of Psychic Studies would probably fall into the category of esoteric, and so would many other smaller, well-meaning websites.

I do not want to live in a world where website material that is inspiring and uplifting is banned, whether intentionally, or as the result of passing laws that make access impossible.

I also do not wish to see “esoteric material” or “alternative belief/spirituality” lumped in with pornography and extreme hate. That is a false and most disturbing association, and must be rectified immediately.

Many uninformed people will start to view “esotericism” and “alternative belief/spirituality” as material that is taboo, and will certainly wish to avoid the stigma of being associated with it.

Dara from Sydney in Australia says, “I think the thing that I find the most disturbing though, is looking down the road to the long-term implications. If this legislation passes in the UK, and then other parts of the world, then that means the power exists for any government, or many of them, to completely shut down a chunk of humanity’s access to spiritual material online. And if the power exists, then someday, someone is likely going to use it, to its full extent. That’s why it’s being put in place now, hidden amidst the other issues. The leap from people being completely banned from sharing, viewing, and publishing esoteric material online, to people being banned from sharing and practicing alternative spirituality in real life is not very big. It could happen so easily once the precedent is set.”

This issue of default filtering is especially important for us to consider here in the UK, but it really will affect many other people who don’t live here.

What if a person travels to the UK for holiday or business, and then can’t access websites that they normally have access to, just because David Cameron and his government say so?

The Open Rights Group says that this matter could be easily avoided by simply having an ‘active choice’ as the ISPs originally suggested with no preset defaults, forcing customers to specify whether they want filters, and what filters exactly.

Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia, has repeatedly stated his opposition to the current plans by the UK government to impose “opt-in” web censorship, and he plans to continue advocating against these laws.

Whether “opt-in” or “opt-out” internet censorship happens or not, is up to us.

Whatever happens next, it is my belief, and I hope it is yours too, that “esoteric material” should not be grouped with “pornography” and “extremist” material. Useful “web forums” should also not be blocked, in my opinion.

Please get involved, and help spread the word that this is an important matter, at a crucial juncture in humanity’s history.

Let’s stand together with one unanimous voice for our right to access content that is helpful and informative. We cannot have this hugely important issue brushed under the carpet under such a pretext.

Please sign, and share with everyone you know.

Prime Minister David Cameron, we are asking you to stop the unnecessary censorship of helpful, genuine, well-meaning “esoteric” websites and web forums, amongst others, so that you do not impinge on the rights of law abiding citizens to free access of information, and to conduct their affairs.

We also ask for clear, transparent communication on this matter, and a promise that ensures that genuine websites and associated businesses will not be harmed by a myopic viewpoint on what is “acceptable content”.

Who wants to be dictated to by a Nanny State? I don’t.

Jaime Tanna

* * * * *
Following is an infographic from “Reaching Light”, that gives a good idea of the extent of what is proposed.

Original graphic published at www.reachinglight.com.

Infographic: UK Filter to Block ‘Esoteric Content’ - Worldwide Implications

* * * * *

~ ~ oOo ~ ~

Given the proclivity of the current resident and imperious “lowjesty”,  I have no doubt but what this is being watched VERY closely, for many reasons. When religious and spiritual access is limited or denied, then ANY other access to information can also be limited or denied.

As is noted in the referenced links, various countries around the world are observing how this flows, in preparation for instigating such procedures in their own countries.

A people with Freedom of Religion is a dangerous people to any totalitarian, oppressive dictatorship. For Freedom of Religion demands the Freedom of Thought and Discernment.

No Dictatorship can tolerate that. 

I may not believe as you do. You may not believe as I do. AND that is OKAY~! But to limit your access to information of interest to you is NOT the right nor the prerogative of ANY governmental entity, NOR of any religious or quasi-religious organization.  You do NOT deserve to “Have your toes stepped on, nor your mind fettered”, and neither do I.  And when someone or something tries to do so, then the fight becomes the fight of all of us.

The prohibition of child pornography is all to the good, IMHO. The censorship of intellectual, emotional and Spiritual freedoms is not. 

Another incisive perspective can be  found here.  

More links on this story here:

https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2013/sleepwalking-into-censorship

http://gigaom.com/2012/06/11/orange-censors-all-blogs/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23452097

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/08/02/war-on-consciousness-takes-to-the-internet-as-esoteric-websites-to-be-censored-in-uk/

http://www.ultraculture.org/uk-to-censor-esoteric-websites/

http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-07/27/pornwall

http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2013/07/uk-risks-sliding-into-something-worse-than-censorship/index.htm  

 

 

.
~ ~ Grouchy ~ ~

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Censorship: First Britain, Then The World

  1. Clyde says:

    Why do I smell the U-frigging-N, Soros’ Open Society Institute, and various muslim groups behind this?

  2. Mrs AL says:

    Great post, Grouchy! Compliments to you.

    I went to the following link you provided: http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-07/27/pornwall The comments after the article were fascinating. Of those I read, a majority of them could have been posted here.

    Also, I am thinking that even if these filters are imposed, someone somewhere will find a way around them.

    • Thank You, Mrs AL,,,
      To my way of thinking, this is even more terrifying in many ways than the muslim menace. And that scares me witless – moreso than I already am, that is.
      Because without the ability to research beliefs, we are denied the most potent weapon of all – Knowledge.

  3. Because they are, Clyde. OR, China, Australia and others would not be looking on “with bated breath”, to see the strength of the push-back. It’s the case of inch by inch and “Death by a thousand cuts” agenda.
    Helluva note, ain’t it???
    Thanks for the visit~!

  4. Kathy says:

    I don’t like porn either, but they have a right to free speech just as much as the Pope does. If it’s censored, for any one, then it’s no longer free.

    This is another prime example of incrementalism where they take away just a smidge of our rights, in the name of the children, then later, behind closed doors, they take a huge chunk out of our rights.

    We must all fight for our smidges, both clean and dirty, or they will never stop.

    • And not just porn, Kathy,,, What about sites that help one quit smoking or drinking??? These are matters of Choice and Health,,, and they’re on the block, as well~!
      What IDIOCY~!

      Thanks for coming by. Hope your pisstivity meter survived – Mine pegged ~!

  5. randy63ism says:

    I’m with Clyde on this one. If the UK implements this, pay close attention to the extreme likelihood that extremist muslim websites will get a free pass and people will have unfettered access to them.

    David Cameron is the UK’s version of a RINO, (TINO?) a closet leftist. In fact, the Tories are pretty much all that way and therefore, much further along in the process than our own Republican Party.

    Great post Grouchy. George Orwell must be spinning in his grave right now, incensed about his inability to yell out from his tomb, “See, I told you so!”

    Wake up people! Arise!

    • Terrifying in its implications, Randy, indeed~! And Lenin and Stalin, as well as Hitler, are applauding like Crazy, to say nothing of Marx~!
      Thanks for stopping in ~! Always good to see you.