(This is another essay from my previous blog. I’m re-posting it here because of my staunch belief that we should not fall prey to the Left’s attempts to redefine our language. Once we accept the language of the Left, the rest is just a matter of time. ˜ CW)
For the past several years now I’ve been unable to peruse a newspaper or magazine without running into the latest human-interest story about somebody “giving back” to their community or, more likely, some self-proclaimed do-gooder calling on everyone else to “give back.” Too many people don’t seem to realize that the seemingly innocuous “giving back” catch phrase was the precursor – and now close relative to – the “nobody got rich on his own” and “you didn’t build that” tripe being spewed by leftists like Elizabeth Warren and Barack Obama. While many have been swift and vocal in their rejection of the “you didn’t build that” comment, some of those same folks seem to have no problem happily chirping about “giving back.”
Let’s start with this question: When did the term “share” suddenly become inadequate to describe what people do when they give some of what is theirs to others? The answer is it became inadequate when the Left realized that to “share” implies charity – the voluntary giving of something that belongs to you as opposed to the fulfillment of an obligation that is owed to others. When we “share,” no entitlement is implied, as it is when we “give back.” “Giving back” is, as with all things the Left does, a subtle manipulation of language intended to instill a subliminal message. It’s meant to change the way people think about what belongs to them and to others, without ever engaging in a debate about it. And it’s been working quite well. Well enough, in fact, that Obama felt emboldened to be a little more open with the plan, only to find out that people don’t really like the leftwing agenda when it’s not veiled in catchy, grade-school slogans.
And it shares another trait with many leftist ploys in that it’s difficult to confront as the Left will simply portray you as a “meany” who doesn’t appreciate others in the community if you don’t go along with the “giving back” scheme. Nonetheless I suggest, my friends, that the next time someone cheerily imposes upon you to “give back,” that you challenge them a little bit by asking what they mean when they say “give back.” When they stare at you, blinking, and mumble something about giving or charity, politely set them straight on the real meaning of charity.